Image not recorded
Massey FergusonModel A
Massey Ferguson 492
Utility
- power
- 99 hp
- displacement
- 269 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 12
Head to head · Utility
Massey Ferguson 492 vs New Holland TN95VA
Image not recorded
New HollandModel B
New Holland TN95VA
Utility
- power
- 91 hp
- displacement
- 238 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 492
vs
New HollandNew Holland TN95VA
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 492 higher · +8 hp (+9%)49299 hp
TN95VA91 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
492 is in the 82nd percentile; TN95VA is in the 79th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 492 higher · +31 ci (+13%)492269 ci
TN95VA238 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
492 is in the 78th percentile; TN95VA is in the 65th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied4924
TN95VA4
Median Utility Tractor4
492 is in the 50th percentile; TN95VA is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ TN95VA higher · +4 (+33%)49212
TN95VA16
Median Utility Tractor12
492 is in the 50th percentile; TN95VA is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
492 (A)TN95VA (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 492 | New Holland TN95VA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Massey Ferguson | New Holland | — |
| Model | 492 | TN95VA | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 492 | New Holland TN95VA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Perkins | Not recorded | — |
| Model | 1104C-44T | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 99hp | 91hp | ▲ 492+8 hp · +9% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,300RPM | ▲ TN95VA+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 269ci | 238ci | ▲ 492+31 ci · +13% |
| Bore | 4.1in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 5in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 492 | New Holland TN95VA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Partially synchronized | 16x16 Synchro Command Plus | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 492 | New Holland TN95VA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 155in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 80in | 43.2in | ▲ 492+36.8 in · +85% |
| Height | Not recorded | 91.2in | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 492 | New Holland TN95VA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 492 | New Holland TN95VA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Independent | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 2 | 1,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
| Power Rating | Not recorded | 80hp | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 492 | New Holland TN95VA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Three-Point Hitch | Same |
| Hitch Category | II | II | Same |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | 4,200lb | 3,962lb | ▲ 492+238 lb · +6% |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 492 | New Holland TN95VA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
| Brake Type | Hydraulic wet disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 492 | New Holland TN95VA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 492 | New Holland TN95VA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 82nd percentile (99 hp)B · 79th percentile (91 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 78th percentile (269 ci)B · 65th percentile (238 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 50th percentile (12)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Width
median 66 inA · 82nd percentile (80 in)B · 7th percentile (43.2 in)
A · 492B · TN95VAMedian Utility Tractor