Head to head · Utility
Ford 7610 vs New Holland TD95D
New HollandModel B
New Holland TD95D
Utility
- power
- 90 hp
- displacement
- 238 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
FordFord 7610
vs
New HollandNew Holland TD95D
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 7610 higher · +7 hp (+8%)761097 hp
TD95D90 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
7610 is in the 82nd percentile; TD95D is in the 78th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 7610 higher · +30 ci (+13%)7610268 ci
TD95D238 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
7610 is in the 75th percentile; TD95D is in the 65th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied76104
TD95D4
Median Utility Tractor4
7610 is in the 50th percentile; TD95D is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ TD95D higher · +172 lb (+3%)76105,935 lb
TD95D6,107 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
7610 is in the 56th percentile; TD95D is in the 58th · 5,107 models
7610 (A)TD95D (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 7610 | New Holland TD95D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | New Holland | — |
| Model | 7610 | TD95D | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 7610 | New Holland TD95D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Iveco | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 8045.25 | — |
| Power Output | 97hp | 90hp | ▲ 7610+7 hp · +8% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,500RPM | ▲ TD95D+400 RPM · +19% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 268ci | 238ci | ▲ 7610+30 ci · +13% |
| Bore | 4.4in | 4.1in | ▲ 7610+0.3 in · +7% |
| Stroke | 4.4in | 4.5in | ▲ TD95D+0.1 in · +2% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 7610 | New Holland TD95D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchromesh Partial Power Shift | Mechanical shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 7610 | New Holland TD95D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 145in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 76.8in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 95.7in | 103in | ▲ TD95D+7.3 in · +8% |
| Operating Weight | 5,935lb | 6,107lb | ▲ TD95D+172 lb · +3% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 7610 | New Holland TD95D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Open Center | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Ford 7610 | New Holland TD95D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Independent | Optional Transmission or Live PTO | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 2 | 1,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 7610 | New Holland TD95D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Category | II | II | Same |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | 4,480lb | 5,027lb | ▲ TD95D+547 lb · +12% |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 7610 | New Holland TD95D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
| Brake Type | Differential mechanical wet disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 7610 | New Holland TD95D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford 7610 | New Holland TD95D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 4.5gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 7610 | New Holland TD95D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Two-post ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 82nd percentile (97 hp)B · 78th percentile (90 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 75th percentile (268 ci)B · 65th percentile (238 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 56th percentile (5,935 lb)B · 58th percentile (6,107 lb)
Height
median 94.1 inA · 54th percentile (95.7 in)B · 73rd percentile (103 in)
A · 7610B · TD95DMedian Utility Tractor