Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Ford 8010 vs Ford 8700
Image not recorded
FordFord 8010
vs
FordFord 8700
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 8700 higher · +21 hp (+20%)8010106 hp
8700127 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
8010 is in the 86th percentile; 8700 is in the 91st · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 8010 higher · +55 ci (+14%)8010456 ci
8700401 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
8010 is in the 93rd percentile; 8700 is in the 90th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied80106
87006
Median Utility Tractor4
8010 is in the 93rd percentile; 8700 is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tied801016
870016
Median Utility Tractor12
8010 is in the 73rd percentile; 8700 is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
8010 (A)8700 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 8010 | Ford 8700 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Ford | Same |
| Model | 8010 | 8700 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 8010 | Ford 8700 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Ford | Same |
| Power Output | 106hp | 127hp | ▲ 8700+21 hp · +20% |
| Rated RPM | Not recorded | 2,300RPM | — |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 456ci | 401ci | ▲ 8010+55 ci · +14% |
| Bore | 4.4in | 4.4in | Same |
| Stroke | 5in | 4.4in | ▲ 8010+0.6 in · +14% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 8010 | Ford 8700 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Unsynchronized gear & Two-speed power shift | Gear type with dry disc clutch | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 8010 | Ford 8700 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 180in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 79.2in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 119in | — |
| Operating Weight | Not recorded | 12,270lb | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 8010 | Ford 8700 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed | Open center | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Ford 8010 | Ford 8700 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Transmission | — |
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 540rpm | — |
| Speed 2 | Not recorded | 1,000rpm | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 8010 | Ford 8700 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | II | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | Category 3 | II | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 8010 | Ford 8700 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 8010 | Ford 8700 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford 8010 | Ford 8700 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 5.3gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 8010 | Ford 8700 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Open operator station | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 86th percentile (106 hp)B · 91st percentile (127 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 93rd percentile (456 ci)B · 90th percentile (401 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 93rd percentile (6)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 73rd percentile (16)
A · 8010B · 8700Median Utility Tractor