Head to head · Utility
Ford 850 vs Kubota L2501-2WD
Image not recorded
KubotaModel B
Kubota L2501-2WD
Utility
- power
- 24.8 hp
- displacement
- 101 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 8
FordFord 850
vs
KubotaKubota L2501-2WD
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 850 higher · +15.2 hp (+61%)85040 hp
L2501-2WD24.8 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
850 is in the 33rd percentile; L2501-2WD is in the 15th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 850 higher · +71 ci (+70%)850172 ci
L2501-2WD101 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
850 is in the 46th percentile; L2501-2WD is in the 23rd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 850 higher · +1 (+33%)8504
L2501-2WD3
Median Utility Tractor4
850 is in the 50th percentile; L2501-2WD is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ L2501-2WD higher · +3 (+60%)8505
L2501-2WD8
Median Utility Tractor12
850 is in the 6th percentile; L2501-2WD is in the 23rd · 4,941 models
850 (A)L2501-2WD (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 850 | Kubota L2501-2WD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Kubota | — |
| Model | 850 | L2501-2WD | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 850 | Kubota L2501-2WD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Kubota | — |
| Model | EAF | D1703-M-DI-E4 | — |
| Power Output | 40hp | 24.8hp | ▲ 850+15.2 hp · +61% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 4 | 3 | ▲ 850+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 172ci | 101ci | ▲ 850+71 ci · +70% |
| Bore | 3.9in | 3.5in | ▲ 850+0.4 in · +11% |
| Stroke | 3.6in | 3.7in | ▲ L2501-2WD+0.1 in · +3% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 850 | Kubota L2501-2WD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Unsynchronized gear | Manual | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 850 | Kubota L2501-2WD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 122in | 111in | ▲ 850+11 in · +10% |
| Width | 64.8in | 55.2in | ▲ 850+9.6 in · +17% |
| Height | 59.3in | 59in | ▲ 850+0.3 in · <1% |
| Operating Weight | 3,400lb | 2,425lb | ▲ 850+975 lb · +40% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 850 | Kubota L2501-2WD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Ford 850 | Kubota L2501-2WD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Transmission | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 850 | Kubota L2501-2WD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | I | Category 1 | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 1,250lb | 1,389lb | ▲ L2501-2WD+139 lb · +11% |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 850 | Kubota L2501-2WD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Manual | Power | — |
| Brake Type | Differential mechanical expanding shoe | Wet disk | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 850 | Kubota L2501-2WD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric Starter | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford 850 | Kubota L2501-2WD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 3.8gal | 1.6gal | ▲ 850+2.2 gal · +137% |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 850 | Kubota L2501-2WD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 33rd percentile (40 hp)B · 15th percentile (24.8 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 46th percentile (172 ci)B · 23rd percentile (101 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 6th percentile (5)B · 23rd percentile (8)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 28th percentile (3,400 lb)B · 16th percentile (2,425 lb)
A · 850B · L2501-2WDMedian Utility Tractor