Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Ford 8700 vs Ford FW-35
FordFord 8700
vs
FordFord FW-35
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ FW-35 higher · +68 hp (+54%)8700127 hp
FW-35195 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
8700 is in the 91st percentile; FW-35 is in the 94th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
= Effectively tied8700401 ci
FW-35401 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
8700 is in the 90th percentile; FW-35 is in the 90th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied87006
FW-356
Median Utility Tractor4
8700 is in the 93rd percentile; FW-35 is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tied870016
FW-3516
Median Utility Tractor12
8700 is in the 73rd percentile; FW-35 is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
8700 (A)FW-35 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 8700 | Ford FW-35 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Ford | Same |
| Model | 8700 | FW-35 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 8700 | Ford FW-35 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Ford | Same |
| Power Output | 127hp | 195hp | ▲ FW-35+68 hp · +54% |
| Rated RPM | 2,300RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ 8700+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 401ci | 401ci | Same |
| Bore | 4.4in | 4.4in | Same |
| Stroke | 4.4in | 4.4in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 8700 | Ford FW-35 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear type with dry disc clutch | Two-speed power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 8700 | Ford FW-35 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 180in | 260in | ▲ FW-35+80 in · +44% |
| Width | 79.2in | 104in | ▲ FW-35+24.8 in · +31% |
| Height | 119in | 134in | ▲ FW-35+15 in · +13% |
| Operating Weight | 12,270lb | 20,503lb | ▲ FW-35+8,233 lb · +67% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 8700 | Ford FW-35 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Closed-center load sensing | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Articulated power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Ford 8700 | Ford FW-35 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Transmission | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 2 | 1,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 8700 | Ford FW-35 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Three-Point Hitch | Same |
| Hitch Category | II | III | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 8700 | Ford FW-35 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 articulated 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Articulated power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 8700 | Ford FW-35 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford 8700 | Ford FW-35 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 5.3gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 8700 | Ford FW-35 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open operator station | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 91st percentile (127 hp)B · 94th percentile (195 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 90th percentile (401 ci)B · 90th percentile (401 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 93rd percentile (6)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 90th percentile (12,270 lb)B · 95th percentile (20,503 lb)
A · 8700B · FW-35Median Utility Tractor