Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Ford 8700 vs Massey Ferguson 5475
Image not recorded
Massey FergusonModel B
Massey Ferguson 5475
Utility
- power
- 134 hp
- displacement
- 402 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
FordFord 8700
vs
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 5475
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 5475 higher · +7 hp (+6%)8700127 hp
5475134 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
8700 is in the 91st percentile; 5475 is in the 91st · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 5475 higher · +1 ci (<1%)8700401 ci
5475402 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
8700 is in the 90th percentile; 5475 is in the 90th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied87006
54756
Median Utility Tractor4
8700 is in the 93rd percentile; 5475 is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tied870016
547516
Median Utility Tractor12
8700 is in the 73rd percentile; 5475 is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
8700 (A)5475 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 8700 | Massey Ferguson 5475 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Massey Ferguson | — |
| Model | 8700 | 5475 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 8700 | Massey Ferguson 5475 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Sisu Diesel | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 1106 | — |
| Power Output | 127hp | 134hp | ▲ 5475+7 hp · +6% |
| Rated RPM | 2,300RPM | 2,000RPM | ▲ 8700+300 RPM · +15% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 401ci | 402ci | ▲ 5475+1 ci · <1% |
| Bore | 4.4in | 4.1in | ▲ 8700+0.3 in · +7% |
| Stroke | 4.4in | 5in | ▲ 5475+0.6 in · +14% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 8700 | Massey Ferguson 5475 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear type with dry disc clutch | Partial power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 8700 | Massey Ferguson 5475 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 180in | 190in | ▲ 5475+10 in · +6% |
| Width | 79.2in | 79.3in | ▲ 5475+0.1 in · <1% |
| Height | 119in | 110in | ▲ 8700+9 in · +8% |
| Operating Weight | 12,270lb | 11,995lb | ▲ 8700+275 lb · +2% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 8700 | Massey Ferguson 5475 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Open center | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Ford 8700 | Massey Ferguson 5475 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Transmission | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 2 | 1,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
Tires
| Spec | Ford 8700 | Massey Ferguson 5475 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 380/85R28 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 460/85R38 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 8700 | Massey Ferguson 5475 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | II | II | Same |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 8700 | Massey Ferguson 5475 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 FWA | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 8700 | Massey Ferguson 5475 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | 12V Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford 8700 | Massey Ferguson 5475 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 5.3gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 8700 | Massey Ferguson 5475 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open operator station | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 91st percentile (127 hp)B · 91st percentile (134 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 90th percentile (401 ci)B · 90th percentile (402 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 93rd percentile (6)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 90th percentile (12,270 lb)B · 90th percentile (11,995 lb)
A · 8700B · 5475Median Utility Tractor