Image not recorded
FordModel A
Ford Commander 6000
Row Crop
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 242 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
Head to head · Row Crop
Ford Commander 6000 vs Valmet 885
ValmetModel B
Valmet 885
Row Crop
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 239 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
FordFord Commander 6000
vs
ValmetValmet 885
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Displacement
▲ Commander 6000 higher · +3 ci (+1%)Commander 6000242 ci
885239 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
Commander 6000 is in the 14th percentile; 885 is in the 14th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
▲ Commander 6000 higher · +2 (+50%)Commander 60006
8854
Median Row Crop Tractor6
Commander 6000 is in the 50th percentile; 885 is in the 17th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ 885 higher · +6 (+60%)Commander 600010
88516
Median Row Crop Tractor16
Commander 6000 is in the 22nd percentile; 885 is in the 50th · 1,200 models
Operating Weight
▲ 885 higher · +1,470 lb (+21%)Commander 60007,130 lb
8858,600 lb
Median Row Crop Tractor12,307 lb
Commander 6000 is in the 16th percentile; 885 is in the 23rd · 1,350 models
Commander 6000 (A)885 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford Commander 6000 | Valmet 885 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Valmet | — |
| Model | Commander 6000 | 885 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford Commander 6000 | Valmet 885 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | MWM | — |
| Model | Not recorded | D229 | — |
| Rated RPM | 2,430RPM | 2,300RPM | ▲ Commander 6000+130 RPM · +6% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 4 | ▲ Commander 6000+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 242ci | 239ci | ▲ Commander 6000+3 ci · +1% |
| Bore | 3.6in | 4in | ▲ 885+0.4 in · +11% |
| Stroke | 3.9in | 4.7in | ▲ 885+0.8 in · +21% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford Commander 6000 | Valmet 885 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Two-speed power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford Commander 6000 | Valmet 885 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 142in | 173in | ▲ 885+31 in · +22% |
| Width | 71.5in | 83.5in | ▲ 885+12 in · +17% |
| Height | 78.2in | 116in | ▲ 885+37.8 in · +48% |
| Operating Weight | 7,130lb | 8,600lb | ▲ 885+1,470 lb · +21% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford Commander 6000 | Valmet 885 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open center | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Ford Commander 6000 | Valmet 885 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Independent | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 2 | 1,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford Commander 6000 | Valmet 885 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | II/I | II | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford Commander 6000 | Valmet 885 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
| Brake Type | Differential hydraulic wet disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford Commander 6000 | Valmet 885 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford Commander 6000 | Valmet 885 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 3.9gal | 3.4gal | ▲ Commander 6000+0.5 gal · +15% |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford Commander 6000 | Valmet 885 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open operator station | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 14th percentile (242 ci)B · 14th percentile (239 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 17th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 22nd percentile (10)B · 50th percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 16th percentile (7,130 lb)B · 23rd percentile (8,600 lb)
Length
median 180 inA · 13th percentile (142 in)B · 40th percentile (173 in)
A · Commander 6000B · 885Median Row Crop Tractor