Head to head · Utility
Ford FW-20 vs Ford FW-35
FordFord FW-20
vs
FordFord FW-35
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ FW-20 higher · +15 hp (+8%)FW-20210 hp
FW-35195 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
FW-20 is in the 95th percentile; FW-35 is in the 94th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ FW-20 higher · +154 ci (+38%)FW-20555 ci
FW-35401 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
FW-20 is in the 94th percentile; FW-35 is in the 90th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ FW-20 higher · +2 (+33%)FW-208
FW-356
Median Utility Tractor4
FW-20 is in the 99th percentile; FW-35 is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ FW-20 higher · +4 (+25%)FW-2020
FW-3516
Median Utility Tractor12
FW-20 is in the 86th percentile; FW-35 is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
FW-20 (A)FW-35 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford FW-20 | Ford FW-35 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Ford | Same |
| Model | FW-20 | FW-35 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford FW-20 | Ford FW-35 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cummins | Ford | — |
| Power Output | 210hp | 195hp | ▲ FW-20+15 hp · +8% |
| Rated RPM | 2,850RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ FW-20+650 RPM · +30% |
| Cylinders | 8 | 6 | ▲ FW-20+2 · +33% |
| Displacement | 555ci | 401ci | ▲ FW-20+154 ci · +38% |
| Bore | 4.6in | 4.4in | ▲ FW-20+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 4.1in | 4.4in | ▲ FW-35+0.3 in · +7% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford FW-20 | Ford FW-35 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Manual | Two-speed power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford FW-20 | Ford FW-35 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 267in | 260in | ▲ FW-20+7 in · +3% |
| Width | Not recorded | 104in | — |
| Height | 134in | 134in | Same |
| Operating Weight | 29,615lb | 20,503lb | ▲ FW-20+9,112 lb · +44% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford FW-20 | Ford FW-35 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Closed-center load sensing | — |
| Steering Type | Articulated Power | Articulated power | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford FW-20 | Ford FW-35 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Three-Point Hitch | Same |
| Hitch Category | Category 3 | III | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford FW-20 | Ford FW-35 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 articulated 4WD | 4x4 articulated 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Articulated Power | Articulated power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford FW-20 | Ford FW-35 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric Starter | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford FW-20 | Ford FW-35 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 13.6gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 95th percentile (210 hp)B · 94th percentile (195 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 94th percentile (555 ci)B · 90th percentile (401 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 99th percentile (8)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 86th percentile (20)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 97th percentile (29,615 lb)B · 95th percentile (20,503 lb)
A · FW-20B · FW-35Median Utility Tractor