
International HarvesterModel A
International Harvester 500C
Crawler
- power
- 44 hp
- displacement
- 155 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 4
Head to head · Crawler

Crawler

Crawler
How they compare
500C is in the 22nd percentile; TD-20 200 is in the 48th · 142 models
500C is in the 22nd percentile; TD-20 200 is in the 73rd · 191 models
500C is in the 10th percentile; TD-20 200 is in the 50th · 192 models
500C is in the 16th percentile; TD-20 200 is in the 34th · 179 models
Full comparison
| Spec | International Harvester 500C | International Harvester TD-20 200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | International Harvester | International Harvester | Same |
| Model | 500C | TD-20 200 | — |
| Category | Crawler, Agricultural | Crawler | — |
| Spec | International Harvester 500C | International Harvester TD-20 200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | International Harvester | International Harvester | Same |
| Model | International Harvester 2.5L 3-cyl diesel | D-691 | — |
| Power Output | 44hp | 134hp | ▲ TD-20 200+90 hp · +205% |
| Rated RPM | 2,500RPM | 1,550RPM | ▲ 500C+950 RPM · +61% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 6 | ▲ TD-20 200+3 · +100% |
| Displacement | 155ci | 691ci | ▲ TD-20 200+536 ci · +346% |
| Bore | 3.9in | 4.8in | ▲ TD-20 200+0.9 in · +23% |
| Stroke | 4.4in | 6.5in | ▲ TD-20 200+2.1 in · +48% |
| Spec | International Harvester 500C | International Harvester TD-20 200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Manual | Gear | — |
| Spec | International Harvester 500C | International Harvester TD-20 200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Width | Not recorded | 22in | — |
| Operating Weight | Not recorded | 32,485lb | — |
| Spec | International Harvester 500C | International Harvester TD-20 200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Crawler | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | Track | Not recorded | — |
| Spec | International Harvester 500C | International Harvester TD-20 200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric Starter | Gasoline-start | — |
Category context