Image not recorded
John DeereModel A
John Deere 5020
Utility
- power
- 141 hp
- displacement
- 531 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 8
Head to head · Utility
John Deere 5020 vs Wagner TR-9
Image not recorded
WagnerModel B
Wagner TR-9
Utility
- power
- 120 hp
- displacement
- 495 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 10
John DeereJohn Deere 5020
vs
WagnerWagner TR-9
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 5020 higher · +21 hp (+18%)5020141 hp
TR-9120 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
5020 is in the 92nd percentile; TR-9 is in the 89th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 5020 higher · +36 ci (+7%)5020531 ci
TR-9495 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
5020 is in the 94th percentile; TR-9 is in the 93rd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 5020 higher · +2 (+50%)50206
TR-94
Median Utility Tractor4
5020 is in the 93rd percentile; TR-9 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ TR-9 higher · +2 (+25%)50208
TR-910
Median Utility Tractor12
5020 is in the 23rd percentile; TR-9 is in the 39th · 4,941 models
5020 (A)TR-9 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | John Deere 5020 | Wagner TR-9 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | John Deere | Wagner | — |
| Model | 5020 | TR-9 | — |
| Category | Utility, Standard Tread | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | John Deere 5020 | Wagner TR-9 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | John Deere | Cummins | — |
| Model | John Deere | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 141hp | 120hp | ▲ 5020+21 hp · +18% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 1,800RPM | ▲ 5020+400 RPM · +22% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 4 | ▲ 5020+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 531ci | 495ci | ▲ 5020+36 ci · +7% |
| Bore | 4.8in | 5.1in | ▲ TR-9+0.3 in · +6% |
| Stroke | 5in | 6in | ▲ TR-9+1 in · +20% |
Transmission
| Spec | John Deere 5020 | Wagner TR-9 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Partially synchronized | Gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | John Deere 5020 | Wagner TR-9 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 172in | 200in | ▲ TR-9+28 in · +16% |
| Width | 95.8in | 94in | ▲ 5020+1.8 in · +2% |
| Height | 98.3in | 87in | ▲ 5020+11.3 in · +13% |
| Operating Weight | 17,350lb | 15,270lb | ▲ 5020+2,080 lb · +14% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | John Deere 5020 | Wagner TR-9 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydraulic power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | John Deere 5020 | Wagner TR-9 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Independent | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 1,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | John Deere 5020 | Wagner TR-9 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | III/II | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | John Deere 5020 | Wagner TR-9 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 articulated 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydraulic power | — |
| Brake Type | Differential hydraulic wet disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | John Deere 5020 | Wagner TR-9 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | John Deere 5020 | Wagner TR-9 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 8.3gal | 7.5gal | ▲ 5020+0.8 gal · +11% |
Operator Station
| Spec | John Deere 5020 | Wagner TR-9 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open operator station | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 92nd percentile (141 hp)B · 89th percentile (120 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 94th percentile (531 ci)B · 93rd percentile (495 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 93rd percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 23rd percentile (8)B · 39th percentile (10)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 94th percentile (17,350 lb)B · 93rd percentile (15,270 lb)
A · 5020B · TR-9Median Utility Tractor