CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Puma 115
Utility
- power
- 115 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
Head to head · Utility
CaseIH Puma 115 vs Wagner TR-9
Image not recorded
WagnerModel B
Wagner TR-9
Utility
- power
- 120 hp
- displacement
- 495 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 10
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 115
vs
WagnerWagner TR-9
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ TR-9 higher · +5 hp (+4%)Puma 115115 hp
TR-9120 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
Puma 115 is in the 88th percentile; TR-9 is in the 89th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ TR-9 higher · +84 ci (+20%)Puma 115411 ci
TR-9495 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
Puma 115 is in the 91st percentile; TR-9 is in the 93rd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ Puma 115 higher · +2 (+50%)Puma 1156
TR-94
Median Utility Tractor4
Puma 115 is in the 93rd percentile; TR-9 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ Puma 115 higher · +8 (+80%)Puma 11518
TR-910
Median Utility Tractor12
Puma 115 is in the 83rd percentile; TR-9 is in the 39th · 4,941 models
Puma 115 (A)TR-9 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 115 | Wagner TR-9 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Wagner | — |
| Model | Puma 115 | TR-9 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 115 | Wagner TR-9 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CNH | Cummins | — |
| Power Output | 115hp | 120hp | ▲ TR-9+5 hp · +4% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 1,800RPM | ▲ Puma 115+400 RPM · +22% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 4 | ▲ Puma 115+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 411ci | 495ci | ▲ TR-9+84 ci · +20% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 5.1in | ▲ TR-9+1 in · +24% |
| Stroke | 5.2in | 6in | ▲ TR-9+0.8 in · +15% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 115 | Wagner TR-9 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | 18-speed partial power shift | Gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 115 | Wagner TR-9 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 200in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 94in | — |
| Height | 118in | 87in | ▲ Puma 115+31 in · +36% |
| Operating Weight | 13,230lb | 15,270lb | ▲ TR-9+2,040 lb · +15% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 115 | Wagner TR-9 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center pressure flow compensated (PFC) | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Hydraulic power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 115 | Wagner TR-9 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | 2/3N | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 115 | Wagner TR-9 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 articulated 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Hydraulic power | — |
| Brake Type | Hydraulic wet disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 115 | Wagner TR-9 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 115 | Wagner TR-9 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 7.5gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 115 | Wagner TR-9 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 88th percentile (115 hp)B · 89th percentile (120 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 91st percentile (411 ci)B · 93rd percentile (495 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 93rd percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 83rd percentile (18)B · 39th percentile (10)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 92nd percentile (13,230 lb)B · 93rd percentile (15,270 lb)
A · Puma 115B · TR-9Median Utility Tractor