Image not recorded
LSModel A
LS MT225S
Sub-Compact
- power
- 24.7 hp
- displacement
- 77.3 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Sub-Compact
LS MT225S vs Mitsubishi MT250
Image not recorded
MitsubishiModel B
Mitsubishi MT250
Sub-Compact
- power
- 25 hp
- displacement
- 78.7 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 9
LSLS MT225S
vs
MitsubishiMitsubishi MT250
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Sub-Compact
Engine Power
▲ MT250 higher · +0.3 hp (+1%)MT225S24.7 hp
MT25025 hp
Median Sub-Compact Tractor26.9 hp
MT225S is in the 43rd percentile; MT250 is in the 46th · 816 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT250 higher · +1.4 ci (+2%)MT225S77.3 ci
MT25078.7 ci
Median Sub-Compact Tractor91.4 ci
MT225S is in the 37th percentile; MT250 is in the 38th · 757 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT225S3
MT2503
Median Sub-Compact Tractor3
MT225S is in the 50th percentile; MT250 is in the 50th · 802 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT250 higher · +176 lb (+10%)MT225S1,764 lb
MT2501,940 lb
Median Sub-Compact Tractor2,700 lb
MT225S is in the 31st percentile; MT250 is in the 35th · 711 models
MT225S (A)MT250 (B)Median Sub-Compact Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | LS MT225S | Mitsubishi MT250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | LS | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | MT225S | MT250 | — |
| Category | Sub-Compact | Sub-Compact | Same |
Engine
| Spec | LS MT225S | Mitsubishi MT250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Yanmar | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | 3TNV80F | K3H | — |
| Power Output | 24.7hp | 25hp | ▲ MT250+0.3 hp · +1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,800RPM | 2,700RPM | ▲ MT225S+100 RPM · +4% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 77.3ci | 78.7ci | ▲ MT250+1.4 ci · +2% |
| Bore | 3.2in | 3.1in | Same |
| Stroke | 3.3in | 3.5in | ▲ MT250+0.2 in · +6% |
Transmission
| Spec | LS MT225S | Mitsubishi MT250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Synchromesh | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | LS MT225S | Mitsubishi MT250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 112in | 103in | ▲ MT225S+9 in · +9% |
| Width | 48.7in | 46.9in | ▲ MT225S+1.8 in · +4% |
| Height | 86.4in | 54.3in | ▲ MT225S+32.1 in · +59% |
| Operating Weight | 1,764lb | 1,940lb | ▲ MT250+176 lb · +10% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | LS MT225S | Mitsubishi MT250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open center | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic | Power | — |
Tires
| Spec | LS MT225S | Mitsubishi MT250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 5.00-15 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 11.2/10-24 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | LS MT225S | Mitsubishi MT250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | I | I | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | LS MT225S | Mitsubishi MT250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | LS MT225S | Mitsubishi MT250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | LS MT225S | Mitsubishi MT250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 26.9 hpA · 43rd percentile (24.7 hp)B · 46th percentile (25 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 91.4 ciA · 37th percentile (77.3 ci)B · 38th percentile (78.7 ci)
Cylinders
median 3A · 50th percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 2,700 lbA · 31st percentile (1,764 lb)B · 35th percentile (1,940 lb)
Length
median 113 inA · 48th percentile (112 in)B · 34th percentile (103 in)
A · MT225SB · MT250Median Sub-Compact Tractor