Head to head · Utility
LS PS70 vs LS XU5065
Image not recorded
LSLS PS70
vs
LSLS XU5065
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ PS70 higher · +6 hp (+9%)PS7071 hp
XU506565 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
PS70 is in the 64th percentile; XU5065 is in the 59th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ PS70 higher · +60 ci (+44%)PS70195 ci
XU5065135 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
PS70 is in the 52nd percentile; XU5065 is in the 33rd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedPS704
XU50654
Median Utility Tractor4
PS70 is in the 50th percentile; XU5065 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ PS70 higher · +24 (+150%)PS7040
XU506516
Median Utility Tractor12
PS70 is in the 99th percentile; XU5065 is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
PS70 (A)XU5065 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | LS PS70 | LS XU5065 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | LS | LS | Same |
| Model | PS70 | XU5065 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | LS PS70 | LS XU5065 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | FPT | Shibaura | — |
| Model | F5C | N4LDI-TA | — |
| Power Output | 71hp | 65hp | ▲ PS70+6 hp · +9% |
| Rated RPM | 2,300RPM | 2,600RPM | ▲ XU5065+300 RPM · +13% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 195ci | 135ci | ▲ PS70+60 ci · +44% |
| Bore | 3.9in | 3.3in | ▲ PS70+0.6 in · +18% |
| Stroke | 4.1in | 3.9in | ▲ PS70+0.2 in · +5% |
Transmission
| Spec | LS PS70 | LS XU5065 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Power shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | LS PS70 | LS XU5065 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 157in | 142in | ▲ PS70+15 in · +11% |
| Width | 77.8in | 67in | ▲ PS70+10.8 in · +16% |
| Height | Not recorded | 103in | — |
| Operating Weight | 6,363lb | 4,674lb | ▲ PS70+1,689 lb · +36% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | LS PS70 | LS XU5065 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | LS PS70 | LS XU5065 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | II | II | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | LS PS70 | LS XU5065 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | MFWD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | LS PS70 | LS XU5065 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Emissions
| Spec | LS PS70 | LS XU5065 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | Not recorded | Tier 4 | — |
| Control System | Not recorded | EGR | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | LS PS70 | LS XU5065 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS or Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 64th percentile (71 hp)B · 59th percentile (65 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 52nd percentile (195 ci)B · 33rd percentile (135 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 99th percentile (40)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 60th percentile (6,363 lb)B · 45th percentile (4,674 lb)
A · PS70B · XU5065Median Utility Tractor