Head to head · Utility
LS U6020 vs Massey Ferguson 264
Image not recorded
Massey FergusonModel B
Massey Ferguson 264
Utility
- power
- 56 hp
- displacement
- 153 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 12
LSLS U6020
vs
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 264
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ U6020 higher · +1 hp (+2%)U602057 hp
26456 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
U6020 is in the 51st percentile; 264 is in the 51st · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ U6020 higher · +7 ci (+5%)U6020160 ci
264153 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
U6020 is in the 43rd percentile; 264 is in the 40th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ U6020 higher · +1 (+33%)U60204
2643
Median Utility Tractor4
U6020 is in the 50th percentile; 264 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ U6020 higher · +4 (+33%)U602016
26412
Median Utility Tractor12
U6020 is in the 73rd percentile; 264 is in the 50th · 4,941 models
U6020 (A)264 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | LS U6020 | Massey Ferguson 264 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | LS | Massey Ferguson | — |
| Model | U6020 | 264 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | LS U6020 | Massey Ferguson 264 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | LS | Perkins | — |
| Model | L4AL-T2 | AT 3.152 | — |
| Power Output | 57hp | 56hp | ▲ U6020+1 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,500RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ U6020+300 RPM · +14% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 3 | ▲ U6020+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 160ci | 153ci | ▲ U6020+7 ci · +5% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 3.6in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 5in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | LS U6020 | Massey Ferguson 264 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchronized shuttle | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | LS U6020 | Massey Ferguson 264 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 135in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 70in | Not recorded | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | LS U6020 | Massey Ferguson 264 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | LS U6020 | Massey Ferguson 264 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | II | III | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | LS U6020 | Massey Ferguson 264 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | LS U6020 | Massey Ferguson 264 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 51st percentile (57 hp)B · 51st percentile (56 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 43rd percentile (160 ci)B · 40th percentile (153 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 50th percentile (12)
A · U6020B · 264Median Utility Tractor