Image not recorded
Massey FergusonModel A
Massey Ferguson 210
Utility
- power
- 25 hp
- displacement
- 77.1 ci
- Cylinders
- 2
- Forward gears
- 12
Head to head · Utility
Massey Ferguson 210 vs Yanmar YM6000
Image not recorded
YanmarModel B
Yanmar YM6000
Utility
- power
- 60 hp
- displacement
- 190 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 210
vs
YanmarYanmar YM6000
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ YM6000 higher · +35 hp (+140%)21025 hp
YM600060 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
210 is in the 16th percentile; YM6000 is in the 54th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ YM6000 higher · +113 ci (+146%)21077.1 ci
YM6000190 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
210 is in the 11th percentile; YM6000 is in the 51st · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ YM6000 higher · +2 (+100%)2102
YM60004
Median Utility Tractor4
210 is in the 3rd percentile; YM6000 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
210 (A)YM6000 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 210 | Yanmar YM6000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Massey Ferguson | Yanmar | — |
| Model | 210 | YM6000 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 210 | Yanmar YM6000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Toyosha | Yanmar | — |
| Model | P126 | 4T95 | — |
| Power Output | 25hp | 60hp | ▲ YM6000+35 hp · +140% |
| Rated RPM | 2,500RPM | Not recorded | — |
| Cylinders | 2 | 4 | ▲ YM6000+2 · +100% |
| Displacement | 77.1ci | 190ci | ▲ YM6000+113 ci · +146% |
| Bore | 3.6in | 3.7in | ▲ YM6000+0.1 in · +3% |
| Stroke | 3.7in | 4.3in | ▲ YM6000+0.6 in · +16% |
Transmission
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 210 | Yanmar YM6000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | gear | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 210 | Yanmar YM6000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating Weight | 2,325lb | Not recorded | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 210 | Yanmar YM6000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | open center | Not recorded | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 210 | Yanmar YM6000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | 540 (1.375) | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 210 | Yanmar YM6000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 210 | Yanmar YM6000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 2WD | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 210 | Yanmar YM6000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 210 | Yanmar YM6000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 1.3gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 16th percentile (25 hp)B · 54th percentile (60 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 11th percentile (77.1 ci)B · 51st percentile (190 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 3rd percentile (2)B · 50th percentile (4)
A · 210B · YM6000Median Utility Tractor