Head to head · Sub-Compact

Massey Ferguson GC1715 vs Mitsubishi MT250

Massey Ferguson GC1715 Tractor
Massey FergusonModel A

Massey Ferguson GC1715

Utility

power
25 hp
displacement
68.5 ci
Cylinders
3
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full GC1715 specs
Image not recorded
MitsubishiModel B

Mitsubishi MT250

Sub-Compact

power
25 hp
displacement
78.7 ci
Cylinders
3
Forward gears
9
Full MT250 specs
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson GC1715
vs
MitsubishiMitsubishi MT250

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Sub-Compact

n = 584–816

Engine Power

= Effectively tied
GC171525 hp
MT25025 hp
Median Sub-Compact Tractor26.9 hp

GC1715 is in the 46th percentile; MT250 is in the 46th · 816 models

Engine Displacement

▲ MT250 higher · +10.2 ci (+15%)
GC171568.5 ci
MT25078.7 ci
Median Sub-Compact Tractor91.4 ci

GC1715 is in the 29th percentile; MT250 is in the 38th · 757 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
GC17153
MT2503
Median Sub-Compact Tractor3

GC1715 is in the 50th percentile; MT250 is in the 50th · 802 models

Operating Weight

▲ MT250 higher · +507 lb (+35%)
GC17151,433 lb
MT2501,940 lb
Median Sub-Compact Tractor2,700 lb

GC1715 is in the 17th percentile; MT250 is in the 35th · 711 models

GC1715 (A)MT250 (B)Median Sub-Compact Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecMassey Ferguson GC1715Mitsubishi MT250Difference
ManufacturerMassey FergusonMitsubishi—
ModelGC1715MT250—
CategoryUtility, Sub-CompactSub-Compact—

Engine

SpecMassey Ferguson GC1715Mitsubishi MT250Difference
ManufacturerIsekiMitsubishi—
ModelNot recordedK3H—
Power Output25hp25hpSame
Rated RPM3,000RPM2,700RPM▲ GC1715+300 RPM · +11%
Cylinders33Same
Displacement68.5ci78.7ci▲ MT250+10.2 ci · +15%
Bore3.1in3.1inSame
Stroke3.1in3.5in▲ MT250+0.4 in · +13%

Transmission

SpecMassey Ferguson GC1715Mitsubishi MT250Difference
TypeHydrostaticSynchromesh—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecMassey Ferguson GC1715Mitsubishi MT250Difference
Length97.2in103in▲ MT250+5.8 in · +6%
Width47.2in46.9in▲ GC1715+0.3 in · <1%
Height72.4in54.3in▲ GC1715+18.1 in · +33%
Operating Weight1,433lb1,940lb▲ MT250+507 lb · +35%

Hydraulics

SpecMassey Ferguson GC1715Mitsubishi MT250Difference
System TypeOpen centerOpen centerSame
Steering TypeHydrostatic powerPower—

Power Take-off (PTO)

SpecMassey Ferguson GC1715Mitsubishi MT250Difference
TypeIndependentNot recorded—
Speed 12,000rpmNot recorded—
Speed 2540rpmNot recorded—

Tires

SpecMassey Ferguson GC1715Mitsubishi MT250Difference
Front Tire SizeNot recorded5.00-15—
Rear Tire SizeNot recorded11.2/10-24—

Hitch & Towing

SpecMassey Ferguson GC1715Mitsubishi MT250Difference
Hitch TypeCategory INot recorded—
Hitch CategoryNot recordedI—
Hitch PositionRearNot recorded—
Hitch Capacity1,190lbNot recorded—

Chassis & Drive

SpecMassey Ferguson GC1715Mitsubishi MT250Difference
Chassis Type4x4 MFWD 4WD4x2 2WD—
Drive Type4WD2WD—
Steering TypeHydrostatic powerPower—
Brake TypeWet discNot recorded—

Electrical

SpecMassey Ferguson GC1715Mitsubishi MT250Difference
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Operator Station

SpecMassey Ferguson GC1715Mitsubishi MT250Difference
TypeTwo-post ROPSNot recorded—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 26.9 hp
A · 46th percentile (25 hp)B · 46th percentile (25 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 91.4 ci
A · 29th percentile (68.5 ci)B · 38th percentile (78.7 ci)

Cylinders

median 3
A · 50th percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (3)

Operating Weight

median 2,700 lb
A · 17th percentile (1,433 lb)B · 35th percentile (1,940 lb)

Length

median 113 in
A · 25th percentile (97.2 in)B · 34th percentile (103 in)
A · GC1715B · MT250Median Sub-Compact Tractor
Full spec pageMassey Ferguson GC1715Full spec pageMitsubishi MT250