Massey-HarrisModel A
Massey-Harris 102 Junior
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 162 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 4
Head to head · Utility
Massey-Harris 102 Junior vs Massey-Harris 202
Massey-HarrisModel B
Massey-Harris 202
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 290 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 4
Massey-HarrisMassey-Harris 102 Junior
vs
Massey-HarrisMassey-Harris 202
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Displacement
▲ 202 higher · +128 ci (+79%)102 Junior162 ci
202290 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
102 Junior is in the 43rd percentile; 202 is in the 84th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 202 higher · +2 (+50%)102 Junior4
2026
Median Utility Tractor4
102 Junior is in the 50th percentile; 202 is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tied102 Junior4
2024
Median Utility Tractor12
102 Junior is in the 4th percentile; 202 is in the 4th · 4,941 models
Operating Weight
▲ 202 higher · +3,300 lb (+97%)102 Junior3,400 lb
2026,700 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
102 Junior is in the 28th percentile; 202 is in the 64th · 5,107 models
102 Junior (A)202 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Massey-Harris 102 Junior | Massey-Harris 202 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Massey-Harris | Massey-Harris | Same |
| Model | 102 Junior | 202 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility, Standard Tread | — |
Engine
| Spec | Massey-Harris 102 Junior | Massey-Harris 202 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Continental | Continental | Same |
| Model | Not recorded | M292 | — |
| Rated RPM | 1,800RPM | Not recorded | — |
| Cylinders | 4 | 6 | ▲ 202+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 162ci | 290ci | ▲ 202+128 ci · +79% |
| Bore | 3.4in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 4.4in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Massey-Harris 102 Junior | Massey-Harris 202 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Gear | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Massey-Harris 102 Junior | Massey-Harris 202 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating Weight | 3,400lb | 6,700lb | ▲ 202+3,300 lb · +97% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Massey-Harris 102 Junior | Massey-Harris 202 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Manual | Manual | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Massey-Harris 102 Junior | Massey-Harris 202 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Manual | Manual | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | Massey-Harris 102 Junior | Massey-Harris 202 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric Starter | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 43rd percentile (162 ci)B · 84th percentile (290 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 4th percentile (4)B · 4th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 28th percentile (3,400 lb)B · 64th percentile (6,700 lb)
A · 102 JuniorB · 202Median Utility Tractor