Massey-HarrisModel A
Massey-Harris 202
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 290 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 4
Head to head · Standard Tread
Massey-Harris 202 vs Massey-Harris Challenger
Massey-HarrisModel B
Massey-Harris Challenger
Standard Tread
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 248 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 4
Massey-HarrisMassey-Harris 202
vs
Massey-HarrisMassey-Harris Challenger
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Standard Tread
Engine Displacement
▲ 202 higher · +42 ci (+17%)202290 ci
Challenger248 ci
Median Standard Tread Tractor382 ci
202 is in the 35th percentile; Challenger is in the 20th · 353 models
Cylinders
▲ 202 higher · +2 (+50%)2026
Challenger4
Median Standard Tread Tractor4
202 is in the 93rd percentile; Challenger is in the 50th · 367 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tied2024
Challenger4
Median Standard Tread Tractor4
202 is in the 50th percentile; Challenger is in the 50th · 341 models
Operating Weight
▲ 202 higher · +2,500 lb (+60%)2026,700 lb
Challenger4,200 lb
Median Standard Tread Tractor6,834 lb
202 is in the 48th percentile; Challenger is in the 16th · 297 models
202 (A)Challenger (B)Median Standard Tread Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Massey-Harris 202 | Massey-Harris Challenger | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Massey-Harris | Massey-Harris | Same |
| Model | 202 | Challenger | — |
| Category | Utility, Standard Tread | Standard Tread | — |
Engine
| Spec | Massey-Harris 202 | Massey-Harris Challenger | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Continental | Massey-Harris | — |
| Model | M292 | Not recorded | — |
| Rated RPM | Not recorded | 1,200RPM | — |
| Cylinders | 6 | 4 | ▲ 202+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 290ci | 248ci | ▲ 202+42 ci · +17% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 3.9in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 5.3in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Massey-Harris 202 | Massey-Harris Challenger | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Gear | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Massey-Harris 202 | Massey-Harris Challenger | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 129in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 58in | — |
| Operating Weight | 6,700lb | 4,200lb | ▲ 202+2,500 lb · +60% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Massey-Harris 202 | Massey-Harris Challenger | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Manual | Manual | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Massey-Harris 202 | Massey-Harris Challenger | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Manual | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Massey-Harris 202 | Massey-Harris Challenger | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 5gal | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 382 ciA · 35th percentile (290 ci)B · 20th percentile (248 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 93rd percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 6,834 lbA · 48th percentile (6,700 lb)B · 16th percentile (4,200 lb)
A · 202B · ChallengerMedian Standard Tread Tractor