Image not recorded
McCormick IntlModel A
McCormick Intl CT50U
Utility
- power
- 43 hp
- displacement
- 153 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Utility
McCormick Intl CT50U vs McCormick Intl X10.40H
Image not recorded
McCormick IntlModel B
McCormick Intl X10.40H
Utility
- power
- 41 hp
- displacement
- 122 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl CT50U
vs
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl X10.40H
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ CT50U higher · +2 hp (+5%)CT50U43 hp
X10.40H41 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
CT50U is in the 37th percentile; X10.40H is in the 35th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ CT50U higher · +31 ci (+25%)CT50U153 ci
X10.40H122 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
CT50U is in the 41st percentile; X10.40H is in the 29th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedCT50U4
X10.40H4
Median Utility Tractor4
CT50U is in the 50th percentile; X10.40H is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ CT50U higher · +1,055 lb (+27%)CT50U5,005 lb
X10.40H3,950 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
CT50U is in the 48th percentile; X10.40H is in the 36th · 5,107 models
CT50U (A)X10.40H (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | McCormick Intl CT50U | McCormick Intl X10.40H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | McCormick Intl | McCormick Intl | Same |
| Model | CT50U | X10.40H | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | McCormick Intl CT50U | McCormick Intl X10.40H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Mitsubishi | Daedong | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 4A200 | — |
| Power Output | 43hp | 41hp | ▲ CT50U+2 hp · +5% |
| Rated RPM | 2,600RPM | 2,600RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 153ci | 122ci | ▲ CT50U+31 ci · +25% |
| Bore | 3.5in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 4.1in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | McCormick Intl CT50U | McCormick Intl X10.40H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Mechanical shuttle shift | Hydrostatic | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | McCormick Intl CT50U | McCormick Intl X10.40H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 125in | 134in | ▲ X10.40H+9 in · +7% |
| Width | 65.7in | 63.9in | ▲ CT50U+1.8 in · +3% |
| Height | 94.4in | 95in | ▲ X10.40H+0.6 in · <1% |
| Operating Weight | 5,005lb | 3,950lb | ▲ CT50U+1,055 lb · +27% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | McCormick Intl CT50U | McCormick Intl X10.40H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Gear pump | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | McCormick Intl CT50U | McCormick Intl X10.40H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Category I | Rear Type I | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | McCormick Intl CT50U | McCormick Intl X10.40H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | McCormick Intl CT50U | McCormick Intl X10.40H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | McCormick Intl CT50U | McCormick Intl X10.40H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | ROPS | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 37th percentile (43 hp)B · 35th percentile (41 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 41st percentile (153 ci)B · 29th percentile (122 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 48th percentile (5,005 lb)B · 36th percentile (3,950 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 34th percentile (125 in)B · 46th percentile (134 in)
A · CT50UB · X10.40HMedian Utility Tractor