Image not recorded
McCormick IntlModel A
McCormick Intl CT65U
Utility
- power
- 57 hp
- displacement
- 203 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Utility
McCormick Intl CT65U vs McCormick Intl X10.55M
Image not recorded
McCormick IntlModel B
McCormick Intl X10.55M
Utility
- power
- 54 hp
- displacement
- 134 ci
- Cylinders
- Not recorded
- Forward gears
- 12
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl CT65U
vs
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl X10.55M
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ CT65U higher · +3 hp (+6%)CT65U57 hp
X10.55M54 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
CT65U is in the 51st percentile; X10.55M is in the 49th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ CT65U higher · +69 ci (+51%)CT65U203 ci
X10.55M134 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
CT65U is in the 56th percentile; X10.55M is in the 32nd · 5,580 models
Forward Gears
▲ CT65U higher · +4 (+33%)CT65U16
X10.55M12
Median Utility Tractor12
CT65U is in the 73rd percentile; X10.55M is in the 50th · 4,941 models
Operating Weight
▲ CT65U higher · +606 lb (+13%)CT65U5,401 lb
X10.55M4,795 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
CT65U is in the 50th percentile; X10.55M is in the 46th · 5,107 models
CT65U (A)X10.55M (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | McCormick Intl CT65U | McCormick Intl X10.55M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | McCormick Intl | McCormick Intl | Same |
| Model | CT65U | X10.55M | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | McCormick Intl CT65U | McCormick Intl X10.55M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Mitsubishi | Daedong | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 4A220TLWB | — |
| Power Output | 57hp | 54hp | ▲ CT65U+3 hp · +6% |
| Rated RPM | 2,500RPM | 2,600RPM | ▲ X10.55M+100 RPM · +4% |
| Cylinders | 4 | Not recorded | — |
| Displacement | 203ci | 134ci | ▲ CT65U+69 ci · +51% |
| Bore | 3.7in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 4.7in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | McCormick Intl CT65U | McCormick Intl X10.55M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Synchronized shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | McCormick Intl CT65U | McCormick Intl X10.55M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 140in | 131in | ▲ CT65U+9 in · +7% |
| Width | 66.9in | 69.3in | ▲ X10.55M+2.4 in · +4% |
| Height | 96in | 107in | ▲ X10.55M+11 in · +11% |
| Operating Weight | 5,401lb | 4,795lb | ▲ CT65U+606 lb · +13% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | McCormick Intl CT65U | McCormick Intl X10.55M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Gear pump | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Tires
| Spec | McCormick Intl CT65U | McCormick Intl X10.55M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 9.5-20 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 14.9-28 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | McCormick Intl CT65U | McCormick Intl X10.55M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Category I | Rear Type I | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | McCormick Intl CT65U | McCormick Intl X10.55M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | McCormick Intl CT65U | McCormick Intl X10.55M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | McCormick Intl CT65U | McCormick Intl X10.55M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | ROPS | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 51st percentile (57 hp)B · 49th percentile (54 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 56th percentile (203 ci)B · 32nd percentile (134 ci)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 50th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 50th percentile (5,401 lb)B · 46th percentile (4,795 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 55th percentile (140 in)B · 42nd percentile (131 in)
A · CT65UB · X10.55MMedian Utility Tractor