Image not recorded
McCormick IntlModel A
McCormick Intl CX105
Utility
- power
- 102 hp
- displacement
- 269 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
McCormick Intl CX105 vs Yanmar LX490
YanmarModel B
Yanmar LX490
Sub-Compact
- power
- 48.5 hp
- displacement
- 122 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl CX105
vs
YanmarYanmar LX490
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ CX105 higher · +53.5 hp (+110%)CX105102 hp
LX49048.5 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
CX105 is in the 84th percentile; LX490 is in the 43rd · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ CX105 higher · +147 ci (+120%)CX105269 ci
LX490122 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
CX105 is in the 77th percentile; LX490 is in the 29th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedCX1054
LX4904
Median Utility Tractor4
CX105 is in the 50th percentile; LX490 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ CX105 higher · +4,662 lb (+129%)CX1058,280 lb
LX4903,618 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
CX105 is in the 77th percentile; LX490 is in the 31st · 5,107 models
CX105 (A)LX490 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | McCormick Intl CX105 | Yanmar LX490 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | McCormick Intl | Yanmar | — |
| Model | CX105 | LX490 | — |
| Category | Utility | Sub-Compact | — |
Engine
| Spec | McCormick Intl CX105 | Yanmar LX490 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Perkins | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 102hp | 48.5hp | ▲ CX105+53.5 hp · +110% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,600RPM | ▲ LX490+400 RPM · +18% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 269ci | 122ci | ▲ CX105+147 ci · +120% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 3.5in | ▲ CX105+0.6 in · +17% |
| Stroke | 5in | 3.6in | ▲ CX105+1.4 in · +39% |
Transmission
| Spec | McCormick Intl CX105 | Yanmar LX490 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Partial power shift | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | McCormick Intl CX105 | Yanmar LX490 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 166in | 124in | ▲ CX105+42 in · +34% |
| Width | Not recorded | 83.4in | — |
| Height | 108in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 8,280lb | 3,618lb | ▲ CX105+4,662 lb · +129% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | McCormick Intl CX105 | Yanmar LX490 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Open center | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | McCormick Intl CX105 | Yanmar LX490 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Electro-hydraulic independent | — |
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 540rpm | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | McCormick Intl CX105 | Yanmar LX490 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | I | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 2,760lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | McCormick Intl CX105 | Yanmar LX490 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | McCormick Intl CX105 | Yanmar LX490 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | McCormick Intl CX105 | Yanmar LX490 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 1.5gal | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 84th percentile (102 hp)B · 43rd percentile (48.5 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 77th percentile (269 ci)B · 29th percentile (122 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 77th percentile (8,280 lb)B · 31st percentile (3,618 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 84th percentile (166 in)B · 33rd percentile (124 in)
A · CX105B · LX490Median Utility Tractor