Image not recorded
McCormick IntlModel A
McCormick Intl CX50
Utility
- power
- 53 hp
- displacement
- 165 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Utility
McCormick Intl CX50 vs McCormick Intl X10.55M
Image not recorded
McCormick IntlModel B
McCormick Intl X10.55M
Utility
- power
- 54 hp
- displacement
- 134 ci
- Cylinders
- Not recorded
- Forward gears
- 12
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl CX50
vs
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl X10.55M
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ X10.55M higher · +1 hp (+2%)CX5053 hp
X10.55M54 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
CX50 is in the 48th percentile; X10.55M is in the 49th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ CX50 higher · +31 ci (+23%)CX50165 ci
X10.55M134 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
CX50 is in the 44th percentile; X10.55M is in the 32nd · 5,580 models
Forward Gears
▲ CX50 higher · +4 (+33%)CX5016
X10.55M12
Median Utility Tractor12
CX50 is in the 73rd percentile; X10.55M is in the 50th · 4,941 models
Operating Weight
▲ CX50 higher · +2,337 lb (+49%)CX507,132 lb
X10.55M4,795 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
CX50 is in the 68th percentile; X10.55M is in the 46th · 5,107 models
CX50 (A)X10.55M (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | McCormick Intl CX50 | McCormick Intl X10.55M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | McCormick Intl | McCormick Intl | Same |
| Model | CX50 | X10.55M | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | McCormick Intl CX50 | McCormick Intl X10.55M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Perkins | Daedong | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 4A220TLWB | — |
| Power Output | 53hp | 54hp | ▲ X10.55M+1 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,250RPM | 2,600RPM | ▲ X10.55M+350 RPM · +16% |
| Cylinders | 3 | Not recorded | — |
| Displacement | 165ci | 134ci | ▲ CX50+31 ci · +23% |
| Bore | 3.7in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 5in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | McCormick Intl CX50 | McCormick Intl X10.55M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synch shuttle | Synchronized shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | McCormick Intl CX50 | McCormick Intl X10.55M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 160in | 131in | ▲ CX50+29 in · +22% |
| Width | 77.3in | 69.3in | ▲ CX50+8 in · +12% |
| Height | Not recorded | 107in | — |
| Operating Weight | 7,132lb | 4,795lb | ▲ CX50+2,337 lb · +49% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | McCormick Intl CX50 | McCormick Intl X10.55M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Gear pump | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Tires
| Spec | McCormick Intl CX50 | McCormick Intl X10.55M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 9.5-20 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 14.9-28 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | McCormick Intl CX50 | McCormick Intl X10.55M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Rear Type I | — |
| Hitch Category | II | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | McCormick Intl CX50 | McCormick Intl X10.55M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | McCormick Intl CX50 | McCormick Intl X10.55M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | McCormick Intl CX50 | McCormick Intl X10.55M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 48th percentile (53 hp)B · 49th percentile (54 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 44th percentile (165 ci)B · 32nd percentile (134 ci)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 50th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 68th percentile (7,132 lb)B · 46th percentile (4,795 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 77th percentile (160 in)B · 42nd percentile (131 in)
A · CX50B · X10.55MMedian Utility Tractor