Image not recorded
McCormick IntlModel A
McCormick Intl X1.25
Sub-Compact
- power
- 24 hp
- displacement
- 73.2 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 6
Head to head · Sub-Compact
McCormick Intl X1.25 vs McCormick Intl X10.35H
Image not recorded
McCormick IntlModel B
McCormick Intl X10.35H
Sub-Compact
- power
- 34 hp
- displacement
- 101 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl X1.25
vs
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl X10.35H
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Sub-Compact
Engine Power
▲ X10.35H higher · +10 hp (+42%)X1.2524 hp
X10.35H34 hp
Median Sub-Compact Tractor26.9 hp
X1.25 is in the 39th percentile; X10.35H is in the 62nd · 816 models
Engine Displacement
▲ X10.35H higher · +27.8 ci (+38%)X1.2573.2 ci
X10.35H101 ci
Median Sub-Compact Tractor91.4 ci
X1.25 is in the 35th percentile; X10.35H is in the 58th · 757 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedX1.253
X10.35H3
Median Sub-Compact Tractor3
X1.25 is in the 50th percentile; X10.35H is in the 50th · 802 models
Operating Weight
▲ X10.35H higher · +1,304 lb (+72%)X1.251,810 lb
X10.35H3,114 lb
Median Sub-Compact Tractor2,700 lb
X1.25 is in the 32nd percentile; X10.35H is in the 58th · 711 models
X1.25 (A)X10.35H (B)Median Sub-Compact Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | McCormick Intl X1.25 | McCormick Intl X10.35H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | McCormick Intl | McCormick Intl | Same |
| Model | X1.25 | X10.35H | — |
| Category | Sub-Compact | Sub-Compact | Same |
Engine
| Spec | McCormick Intl X1.25 | McCormick Intl X10.35H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Kukje | Daedong | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 3A165 | — |
| Power Output | 24hp | 34hp | ▲ X10.35H+10 hp · +42% |
| Rated RPM | 2,600RPM | 2,600RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 73.2ci | 101ci | ▲ X10.35H+27.8 ci · +38% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 3.4in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 3.6in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | McCormick Intl X1.25 | McCormick Intl X10.35H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Hydrostatic | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | McCormick Intl X1.25 | McCormick Intl X10.35H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 106in | 122in | ▲ X10.35H+16 in · +15% |
| Width | Not recorded | 54.6in | — |
| Height | 88in | 96.8in | ▲ X10.35H+8.8 in · +10% |
| Operating Weight | 1,810lb | 3,114lb | ▲ X10.35H+1,304 lb · +72% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | McCormick Intl X1.25 | McCormick Intl X10.35H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Gear pump | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | McCormick Intl X1.25 | McCormick Intl X10.35H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Category I | Rear Type I | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | McCormick Intl X1.25 | McCormick Intl X10.35H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | McCormick Intl X1.25 | McCormick Intl X10.35H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | McCormick Intl X1.25 | McCormick Intl X10.35H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | ROPS | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 26.9 hpA · 39th percentile (24 hp)B · 62nd percentile (34 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 91.4 ciA · 35th percentile (73.2 ci)B · 58th percentile (101 ci)
Cylinders
median 3A · 50th percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 2,700 lbA · 32nd percentile (1,810 lb)B · 58th percentile (3,114 lb)
Length
median 113 inA · 40th percentile (106 in)B · 64th percentile (122 in)
A · X1.25B · X10.35HMedian Sub-Compact Tractor