Image not recorded
McCormick IntlModel A
McCormick Intl X10.30H
Sub-Compact
- power
- 28 hp
- displacement
- 85 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Sub-Compact
McCormick Intl X10.30H vs McCormick Intl X10.35H
Image not recorded
McCormick IntlModel B
McCormick Intl X10.35H
Sub-Compact
- power
- 34 hp
- displacement
- 101 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl X10.30H
vs
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl X10.35H
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Sub-Compact
Engine Power
▲ X10.35H higher · +6 hp (+21%)X10.30H28 hp
X10.35H34 hp
Median Sub-Compact Tractor26.9 hp
X10.30H is in the 53rd percentile; X10.35H is in the 62nd · 816 models
Engine Displacement
▲ X10.35H higher · +16 ci (+19%)X10.30H85 ci
X10.35H101 ci
Median Sub-Compact Tractor91.4 ci
X10.30H is in the 45th percentile; X10.35H is in the 58th · 757 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedX10.30H3
X10.35H3
Median Sub-Compact Tractor3
X10.30H is in the 50th percentile; X10.35H is in the 50th · 802 models
Operating Weight
▲ X10.30H higher · +3 lb (<1%)X10.30H3,117 lb
X10.35H3,114 lb
Median Sub-Compact Tractor2,700 lb
X10.30H is in the 59th percentile; X10.35H is in the 58th · 711 models
X10.30H (A)X10.35H (B)Median Sub-Compact Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | McCormick Intl X10.30H | McCormick Intl X10.35H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | McCormick Intl | McCormick Intl | Same |
| Model | X10.30H | X10.35H | — |
| Category | Sub-Compact | Sub-Compact | Same |
Engine
| Spec | McCormick Intl X10.30H | McCormick Intl X10.35H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Daedong | Daedong | Same |
| Model | 3A139 | 3A165 | — |
| Power Output | 28hp | 34hp | ▲ X10.35H+6 hp · +21% |
| Rated RPM | 2,600RPM | 2,600RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 85ci | 101ci | ▲ X10.35H+16 ci · +19% |
| Bore | 3.2in | 3.4in | ▲ X10.35H+0.3 in · +10% |
| Stroke | 3.6in | 3.6in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | McCormick Intl X10.30H | McCormick Intl X10.35H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Hydrostatic | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | McCormick Intl X10.30H | McCormick Intl X10.35H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 122in | 122in | Same |
| Width | 54.6in | 54.6in | Same |
| Height | 96.8in | 96.8in | Same |
| Operating Weight | 3,117lb | 3,114lb | ▲ X10.30H+3 lb · <1% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | McCormick Intl X10.30H | McCormick Intl X10.35H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Gear pump | Gear pump | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | McCormick Intl X10.30H | McCormick Intl X10.35H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear Type I | Rear Type I | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | McCormick Intl X10.30H | McCormick Intl X10.35H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | McCormick Intl X10.30H | McCormick Intl X10.35H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | McCormick Intl X10.30H | McCormick Intl X10.35H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | ROPS | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 26.9 hpA · 53rd percentile (28 hp)B · 62nd percentile (34 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 91.4 ciA · 45th percentile (85 ci)B · 58th percentile (101 ci)
Cylinders
median 3A · 50th percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 2,700 lbA · 59th percentile (3,117 lb)B · 58th percentile (3,114 lb)
Length
median 113 inA · 64th percentile (122 in)B · 64th percentile (122 in)
A · X10.30HB · X10.35HMedian Sub-Compact Tractor