Image not recorded
McCormick IntlModel A
McCormick Intl X50.50
Utility
- power
- 113 hp
- displacement
- 208 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
McCormick Intl X50.50 vs McCormick Intl X6.430
Image not recorded
McCormick IntlModel B
McCormick Intl X6.430
Utility
- power
- 121 hp
- displacement
- 275 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 36
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl X50.50
vs
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl X6.430
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ X6.430 higher · +8 hp (+7%)X50.50113 hp
X6.430121 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
X50.50 is in the 88th percentile; X6.430 is in the 90th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ X6.430 higher · +67 ci (+32%)X50.50208 ci
X6.430275 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
X50.50 is in the 58th percentile; X6.430 is in the 80th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedX50.504
X6.4304
Median Utility Tractor4
X50.50 is in the 50th percentile; X6.430 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ X6.430 higher · +2,332 lb (+29%)X50.508,030 lb
X6.43010,362 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
X50.50 is in the 76th percentile; X6.430 is in the 87th · 5,107 models
X50.50 (A)X6.430 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | McCormick Intl X50.50 | McCormick Intl X6.430 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | McCormick Intl | McCormick Intl | Same |
| Model | X50.50 | X6.430 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | McCormick Intl X50.50 | McCormick Intl X6.430 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Perkins | McCormick Intl | — |
| Model | 854E-E34TA | BetaPower | — |
| Power Output | 113hp | 121hp | ▲ X6.430+8 hp · +7% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 208ci | 275ci | ▲ X6.430+67 ci · +32% |
| Bore | 3.9in | 4.1in | ▲ X6.430+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 4.3in | 5.2in | ▲ X6.430+0.9 in · +21% |
Transmission
| Spec | McCormick Intl X50.50 | McCormick Intl X6.430 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Power Shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | McCormick Intl X50.50 | McCormick Intl X6.430 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 164in | 173in | ▲ X6.430+9 in · +5% |
| Width | 83in | 80.9in | ▲ X50.50+2.1 in · +3% |
| Height | 101in | 110in | ▲ X6.430+9 in · +9% |
| Ground Clearance | Not recorded | 16.5in | — |
| Operating Weight | 8,030lb | 10,362lb | ▲ X6.430+2,332 lb · +29% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | McCormick Intl X50.50 | McCormick Intl X6.430 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open Center | — |
| Steering Hydraulic Flow | Not recorded | 10gpm | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | McCormick Intl X50.50 | McCormick Intl X6.430 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | II | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | McCormick Intl X50.50 | McCormick Intl X6.430 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | McCormick Intl X50.50 | McCormick Intl X6.430 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Emissions
| Spec | McCormick Intl X50.50 | McCormick Intl X6.430 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | Not recorded | Interim Tier IV | — |
| Control System | Not recorded | Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 88th percentile (113 hp)B · 90th percentile (121 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 58th percentile (208 ci)B · 80th percentile (275 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 76th percentile (8,030 lb)B · 87th percentile (10,362 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 82nd percentile (164 in)B · 88th percentile (173 in)
A · X50.50B · X6.430Median Utility Tractor