Image not recorded
McCormick IntlModel A
McCormick Intl X50.50
Utility
- power
- 113 hp
- displacement
- 208 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
McCormick Intl X50.50 vs McCormick Intl X60.50
Image not recorded
McCormick IntlModel B
McCormick Intl X60.50
Utility
- power
- 112 hp
- displacement
- 269 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 48
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl X50.50
vs
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl X60.50
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ X50.50 higher · +1 hp (<1%)X50.50113 hp
X60.50112 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
X50.50 is in the 88th percentile; X60.50 is in the 87th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ X60.50 higher · +61 ci (+29%)X50.50208 ci
X60.50269 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
X50.50 is in the 58th percentile; X60.50 is in the 77th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedX50.504
X60.504
Median Utility Tractor4
X50.50 is in the 50th percentile; X60.50 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ X60.50 higher · +1,229 lb (+15%)X50.508,030 lb
X60.509,259 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
X50.50 is in the 76th percentile; X60.50 is in the 83rd · 5,107 models
X50.50 (A)X60.50 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | McCormick Intl X50.50 | McCormick Intl X60.50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | McCormick Intl | McCormick Intl | Same |
| Model | X50.50 | X60.50 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | McCormick Intl X50.50 | McCormick Intl X60.50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Perkins | Perkins | Same |
| Model | 854E-E34TA | 1104D-44TA | — |
| Power Output | 113hp | 112hp | ▲ X50.50+1 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | Not recorded | — |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 208ci | 269ci | ▲ X60.50+61 ci · +29% |
| Bore | 3.9in | 4.1in | ▲ X60.50+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 4.3in | 5in | ▲ X60.50+0.7 in · +16% |
Transmission
| Spec | McCormick Intl X50.50 | McCormick Intl X60.50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Xtrashift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | McCormick Intl X50.50 | McCormick Intl X60.50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 164in | 173in | ▲ X60.50+9 in · +5% |
| Width | 83in | 92.4in | ▲ X60.50+9.4 in · +11% |
| Height | 101in | 108in | ▲ X60.50+7 in · +7% |
| Operating Weight | 8,030lb | 9,259lb | ▲ X60.50+1,229 lb · +15% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | McCormick Intl X50.50 | McCormick Intl X60.50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | McCormick Intl X50.50 | McCormick Intl X60.50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | 3-point | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | II | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | McCormick Intl X50.50 | McCormick Intl X60.50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | McCormick Intl X50.50 | McCormick Intl X60.50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Emissions
| Spec | McCormick Intl X50.50 | McCormick Intl X60.50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | Not recorded | Tier 3 | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | McCormick Intl X50.50 | McCormick Intl X60.50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 88th percentile (113 hp)B · 87th percentile (112 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 58th percentile (208 ci)B · 77th percentile (269 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 76th percentile (8,030 lb)B · 83rd percentile (9,259 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 82nd percentile (164 in)B · 88th percentile (173 in)
A · X50.50B · X60.50Median Utility Tractor