Image not recorded
Minneapolis-MolineModel A
Minneapolis-Moline 335
Utility
- power
- 35.7 hp
- displacement
- 165 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 10
Head to head · Utility
Minneapolis-Moline 335 vs Minneapolis-Moline GT
Image not recorded
Minneapolis-MolineModel B
Minneapolis-Moline GT
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 403 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 4
Minneapolis-MolineMinneapolis-Moline 335
vs
Minneapolis-MolineMinneapolis-Moline GT
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Displacement
▲ GT higher · +238 ci (+144%)335165 ci
GT403 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
335 is in the 44th percentile; GT is in the 90th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied3354
GT4
Median Utility Tractor4
335 is in the 50th percentile; GT is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 335 higher · +6 (+150%)33510
GT4
Median Utility Tractor12
335 is in the 39th percentile; GT is in the 4th · 4,941 models
Operating Weight
▲ GT higher · +3,730 lb (+121%)3353,070 lb
GT6,800 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
335 is in the 24th percentile; GT is in the 65th · 5,107 models
335 (A)GT (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Minneapolis-Moline 335 | Minneapolis-Moline GT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Minneapolis-Moline | Minneapolis-Moline | Same |
| Model | 335 | GT | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility, Standard Tread | — |
Engine
| Spec | Minneapolis-Moline 335 | Minneapolis-Moline GT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Minneapolis-Moline | Minneapolis-Moline | Same |
| Model | 165A | GE | — |
| Power Output | 35.7hp | Not recorded | — |
| Rated RPM | Not recorded | 1,075RPM | — |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 165ci | 403ci | ▲ GT+238 ci · +144% |
| Bore | 3.6in | 4.6in | ▲ GT+1 in · +28% |
| Stroke | 4in | 6in | ▲ GT+2 in · +50% |
Transmission
| Spec | Minneapolis-Moline 335 | Minneapolis-Moline GT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Unsynchronized gear | Manual | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Minneapolis-Moline 335 | Minneapolis-Moline GT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 121in | 137in | ▲ GT+16 in · +13% |
| Width | 58.8in | 72in | ▲ GT+13.2 in · +22% |
| Height | 67.6in | 76in | ▲ GT+8.4 in · +12% |
| Operating Weight | 3,070lb | 6,800lb | ▲ GT+3,730 lb · +121% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Minneapolis-Moline 335 | Minneapolis-Moline GT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Manual worm-and-sector | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Minneapolis-Moline 335 | Minneapolis-Moline GT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | I Opt | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | Category 3 | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Minneapolis-Moline 335 | Minneapolis-Moline GT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Tricycle | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Manual worm-and-sector | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Minneapolis-Moline 335 | Minneapolis-Moline GT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric Starter (6 volts) | Hand-crank | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Minneapolis-Moline 335 | Minneapolis-Moline GT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 2.8gal | 7gal | ▲ GT+4.2 gal · +150% |
Operator Station
| Spec | Minneapolis-Moline 335 | Minneapolis-Moline GT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 44th percentile (165 ci)B · 90th percentile (403 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 39th percentile (10)B · 4th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 24th percentile (3,070 lb)B · 65th percentile (6,800 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 29th percentile (121 in)B · 50th percentile (137 in)
A · 335B · GTMedian Utility Tractor