Image not recorded
Minneapolis-MolineModel A
Minneapolis-Moline 335
Utility
- power
- 35.7 hp
- displacement
- 165 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 10
Head to head · Utility
Minneapolis-Moline 335 vs Minneapolis-Moline RTU
Image not recorded
Minneapolis-MolineModel B
Minneapolis-Moline RTU
Lawn and Garden
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 165 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 4
Minneapolis-MolineMinneapolis-Moline 335
vs
Minneapolis-MolineMinneapolis-Moline RTU
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Displacement
= Effectively tied335165 ci
RTU165 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
335 is in the 44th percentile; RTU is in the 44th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied3354
RTU4
Median Utility Tractor4
335 is in the 50th percentile; RTU is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 335 higher · +6 (+150%)33510
RTU4
Median Utility Tractor12
335 is in the 39th percentile; RTU is in the 4th · 4,941 models
Operating Weight
▲ RTU higher · +30 lb (<1%)3353,070 lb
RTU3,100 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
335 is in the 24th percentile; RTU is in the 24th · 5,107 models
335 (A)RTU (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Minneapolis-Moline 335 | Minneapolis-Moline RTU | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Minneapolis-Moline | Minneapolis-Moline | Same |
| Model | 335 | RTU | — |
| Category | Utility | Lawn and Garden | — |
Engine
| Spec | Minneapolis-Moline 335 | Minneapolis-Moline RTU | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Minneapolis-Moline | Minneapolis-Moline | Same |
| Model | 165A | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 35.7hp | Not recorded | — |
| Rated RPM | Not recorded | 1,500RPM | — |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 165ci | 165ci | Same |
| Bore | 3.6in | 3.6in | Same |
| Stroke | 4in | 4in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | Minneapolis-Moline 335 | Minneapolis-Moline RTU | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Unsynchronized gear | Unsynchronized gear | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Minneapolis-Moline 335 | Minneapolis-Moline RTU | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 121in | 116in | ▲ 335+5 in · +4% |
| Width | 58.8in | 81.1in | ▲ RTU+22.3 in · +38% |
| Height | 67.6in | 68.5in | ▲ RTU+0.9 in · +1% |
| Operating Weight | 3,070lb | 3,100lb | ▲ RTU+30 lb · <1% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Minneapolis-Moline 335 | Minneapolis-Moline RTU | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Manual | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Minneapolis-Moline 335 | Minneapolis-Moline RTU | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | I Opt | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | Category 3 | III | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Minneapolis-Moline 335 | Minneapolis-Moline RTU | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Tricycle | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Manual | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Minneapolis-Moline 335 | Minneapolis-Moline RTU | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric Starter (6 volts) | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Minneapolis-Moline 335 | Minneapolis-Moline RTU | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 2.8gal | 3.4gal | ▲ RTU+0.6 gal · +21% |
Operator Station
| Spec | Minneapolis-Moline 335 | Minneapolis-Moline RTU | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 44th percentile (165 ci)B · 44th percentile (165 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 39th percentile (10)B · 4th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 24th percentile (3,070 lb)B · 24th percentile (3,100 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 29th percentile (121 in)B · 22nd percentile (116 in)
A · 335B · RTUMedian Utility Tractor