Minneapolis-MolineModel A
Minneapolis-Moline 4 Star
Row Crop
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 207 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 10
Head to head · Row Crop
Minneapolis-Moline 4 Star vs Minneapolis-Moline RTU
Image not recorded
Minneapolis-MolineModel B
Minneapolis-Moline RTU
Lawn and Garden
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 165 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 4
Minneapolis-MolineMinneapolis-Moline 4 Star
vs
Minneapolis-MolineMinneapolis-Moline RTU
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Displacement
▲ 4 Star higher · +42 ci (+25%)4 Star207 ci
RTU165 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
4 Star is in the 10th percentile; RTU is in the 5th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied4 Star4
RTU4
Median Row Crop Tractor6
4 Star is in the 17th percentile; RTU is in the 17th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ 4 Star higher · +6 (+150%)4 Star10
RTU4
Median Row Crop Tractor16
4 Star is in the 22nd percentile; RTU is in the 4th · 1,200 models
Operating Weight
▲ 4 Star higher · +2,145 lb (+69%)4 Star5,245 lb
RTU3,100 lb
Median Row Crop Tractor12,307 lb
4 Star is in the 9th percentile; RTU is in the 2nd · 1,350 models
4 Star (A)RTU (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Minneapolis-Moline 4 Star | Minneapolis-Moline RTU | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Minneapolis-Moline | Minneapolis-Moline | Same |
| Model | 4 Star | RTU | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Lawn and Garden | — |
Engine
| Spec | Minneapolis-Moline 4 Star | Minneapolis-Moline RTU | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Minneapolis-Moline | Minneapolis-Moline | Same |
| Rated RPM | 1,750RPM | 1,500RPM | ▲ 4 Star+250 RPM · +17% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 207ci | 165ci | ▲ 4 Star+42 ci · +25% |
| Bore | 3.6in | 3.6in | Same |
| Stroke | 5in | 4in | ▲ 4 Star+1 in · +25% |
Transmission
| Spec | Minneapolis-Moline 4 Star | Minneapolis-Moline RTU | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Unsynchronized gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Minneapolis-Moline 4 Star | Minneapolis-Moline RTU | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 132in | 116in | ▲ 4 Star+16 in · +14% |
| Width | 82in | 81.1in | ▲ 4 Star+0.9 in · +1% |
| Height | 86in | 68.5in | ▲ 4 Star+17.5 in · +26% |
| Operating Weight | 5,245lb | 3,100lb | ▲ 4 Star+2,145 lb · +69% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Minneapolis-Moline 4 Star | Minneapolis-Moline RTU | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Power | Manual | — |
Tires
| Spec | Minneapolis-Moline 4 Star | Minneapolis-Moline RTU | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 6.00-16 | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 13.6-38 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Minneapolis-Moline 4 Star | Minneapolis-Moline RTU | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | III | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Minneapolis-Moline 4 Star | Minneapolis-Moline RTU | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Manual | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Minneapolis-Moline 4 Star | Minneapolis-Moline RTU | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Minneapolis-Moline 4 Star | Minneapolis-Moline RTU | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 3.4gal | 3.4gal | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 10th percentile (207 ci)B · 5th percentile (165 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 17th percentile (4)B · 17th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 22nd percentile (10)B · 4th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 9th percentile (5,245 lb)B · 2nd percentile (3,100 lb)
Length
median 180 inA · 7th percentile (132 in)B · 2nd percentile (116 in)
A · 4 StarB · RTUMedian Row Crop Tractor