Minneapolis-MolineModel A
Minneapolis-Moline BF
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 133 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 4
Head to head · Utility
Minneapolis-Moline BF vs Minneapolis-Moline GT
Image not recorded
Minneapolis-MolineModel B
Minneapolis-Moline GT
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 403 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 4
Minneapolis-MolineMinneapolis-Moline BF
vs
Minneapolis-MolineMinneapolis-Moline GT
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Displacement
▲ GT higher · +270 ci (+203%)BF133 ci
GT403 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
BF is in the 31st percentile; GT is in the 90th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ GT higher · +1 (+33%)BF3
GT4
Median Utility Tractor4
BF is in the 23rd percentile; GT is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tiedBF4
GT4
Median Utility Tractor12
BF is in the 4th percentile; GT is in the 4th · 4,941 models
Operating Weight
▲ GT higher · +3,164 lb (+87%)BF3,636 lb
GT6,800 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
BF is in the 31st percentile; GT is in the 65th · 5,107 models
BF (A)GT (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Minneapolis-Moline BF | Minneapolis-Moline GT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Minneapolis-Moline | Minneapolis-Moline | Same |
| Model | BF | GT | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility, Standard Tread | — |
Engine
| Spec | Minneapolis-Moline BF | Minneapolis-Moline GT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Minneapolis-Moline | Minneapolis-Moline | Same |
| Model | 235.3.31 8 | GE | — |
| Rated RPM | 1,800RPM | 1,075RPM | ▲ BF+725 RPM · +67% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 4 | ▲ GT+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 133ci | 403ci | ▲ GT+270 ci · +203% |
| Bore | 3in | 4.6in | ▲ GT+1.6 in · +53% |
| Stroke | 3in | 6in | ▲ GT+3 in · +100% |
Transmission
| Spec | Minneapolis-Moline BF | Minneapolis-Moline GT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Unsynchronized Gear | Manual | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Minneapolis-Moline BF | Minneapolis-Moline GT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 117in | 137in | ▲ GT+20 in · +17% |
| Width | Not recorded | 72in | — |
| Height | 76in | 76in | Same |
| Wheelbase | 79in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 3,636lb | 6,800lb | ▲ GT+3,164 lb · +87% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Minneapolis-Moline BF | Minneapolis-Moline GT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Manual | Manual worm-and-sector | — |
Tires
| Spec | Minneapolis-Moline BF | Minneapolis-Moline GT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 5.50-15 | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 28-Oct | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Minneapolis-Moline BF | Minneapolis-Moline GT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Optional | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Minneapolis-Moline BF | Minneapolis-Moline GT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Tricycle | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Manual | Manual worm-and-sector | — |
| Brake Type | External contracting bands operated by right foot on pedals either independently or interlocked | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Minneapolis-Moline BF | Minneapolis-Moline GT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Hand-crank | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Minneapolis-Moline BF | Minneapolis-Moline GT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 2.8gal | 7gal | ▲ GT+4.2 gal · +150% |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 31st percentile (133 ci)B · 90th percentile (403 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 4th percentile (4)B · 4th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 31st percentile (3,636 lb)B · 65th percentile (6,800 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 23rd percentile (117 in)B · 50th percentile (137 in)
A · BFB · GTMedian Utility Tractor