MitsubishiModel A
Mitsubishi MT1601
Utility
- power
- 15.8 hp
- displacement
- 54.9 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Mitsubishi MT1601 vs Yanmar LX490
YanmarModel B
Yanmar LX490
Sub-Compact
- power
- 48.5 hp
- displacement
- 122 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
MitsubishiMitsubishi MT1601
vs
YanmarYanmar LX490
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ LX490 higher · +32.7 hp (+207%)MT160115.8 hp
LX49048.5 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
MT1601 is in the 3rd percentile; LX490 is in the 43rd · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ LX490 higher · +67.1 ci (+122%)MT160154.9 ci
LX490122 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
MT1601 is in the 4th percentile; LX490 is in the 29th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ LX490 higher · +1 (+33%)MT16013
LX4904
Median Utility Tractor4
MT1601 is in the 23rd percentile; LX490 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ LX490 higher · +2,383 lb (+193%)MT16011,235 lb
LX4903,618 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
MT1601 is in the 2nd percentile; LX490 is in the 31st · 5,107 models
MT1601 (A)LX490 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Mitsubishi MT1601 | Yanmar LX490 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Mitsubishi | Yanmar | — |
| Model | MT1601 | LX490 | — |
| Category | Utility | Sub-Compact | — |
Engine
| Spec | Mitsubishi MT1601 | Yanmar LX490 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Mitsubishi | Not recorded | — |
| Model | K3C | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 15.8hp | 48.5hp | ▲ LX490+32.7 hp · +207% |
| Rated RPM | 2,400RPM | 2,600RPM | ▲ LX490+200 RPM · +8% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 4 | ▲ LX490+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 54.9ci | 122ci | ▲ LX490+67.1 ci · +122% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 3.5in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 3.6in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Mitsubishi MT1601 | Yanmar LX490 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Mitsubishi MT1601 | Yanmar LX490 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 88.8in | 124in | ▲ LX490+35.2 in · +40% |
| Width | 38.6in | 83.4in | ▲ LX490+44.8 in · +116% |
| Height | 47.2in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 1,235lb | 3,618lb | ▲ LX490+2,383 lb · +193% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Mitsubishi MT1601 | Yanmar LX490 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open center | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Mitsubishi MT1601 | Yanmar LX490 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Electro-hydraulic independent | — |
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 540rpm | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Mitsubishi MT1601 | Yanmar LX490 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | Category 3 | I | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 2,760lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Mitsubishi MT1601 | Yanmar LX490 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Mitsubishi MT1601 | Yanmar LX490 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Mitsubishi MT1601 | Yanmar LX490 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 1.5gal | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 3rd percentile (15.8 hp)B · 43rd percentile (48.5 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 4th percentile (54.9 ci)B · 29th percentile (122 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 2nd percentile (1,235 lb)B · 31st percentile (3,618 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 4th percentile (88.8 in)B · 33rd percentile (124 in)
A · MT1601B · LX490Median Utility Tractor