Image not recorded
MitsubishiModel A
Mitsubishi MT1800
Utility
- power
- 18 hp
- displacement
- 58.1 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 6
Head to head · Utility
Mitsubishi MT1800 vs Yanmar Ke-200H
Image not recorded
YanmarModel B
Yanmar Ke-200H
Utility
- power
- 20 hp
- displacement
- 61.4 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
MitsubishiMitsubishi MT1800
vs
YanmarYanmar Ke-200H
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ Ke-200H higher · +2 hp (+11%)MT180018 hp
Ke-200H20 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
MT1800 is in the 6th percentile; Ke-200H is in the 8th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Ke-200H higher · +3.3 ci (+6%)MT180058.1 ci
Ke-200H61.4 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
MT1800 is in the 5th percentile; Ke-200H is in the 7th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT18003
Ke-200H3
Median Utility Tractor4
MT1800 is in the 23rd percentile; Ke-200H is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ Ke-200H higher · +150 lb (+10%)MT18001,499 lb
Ke-200H1,649 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
MT1800 is in the 6th percentile; Ke-200H is in the 8th · 5,107 models
MT1800 (A)Ke-200H (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Mitsubishi MT1800 | Yanmar Ke-200H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Mitsubishi | Yanmar | — |
| Model | MT1800 | Ke-200H | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Mitsubishi MT1800 | Yanmar Ke-200H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Mitsubishi | Yanmar | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 3TNE74 | — |
| Power Output | 18hp | 20hp | ▲ Ke-200H+2 hp · +11% |
| Rated RPM | 2,600RPM | 2,550RPM | ▲ MT1800+50 RPM · +2% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 58.1ci | 61.4ci | ▲ Ke-200H+3.3 ci · +6% |
| Bore | 3in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 2.8in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Mitsubishi MT1800 | Yanmar Ke-200H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic/Gear | Hydrostatic | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Mitsubishi MT1800 | Yanmar Ke-200H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 101in | 107in | ▲ Ke-200H+6 in · +6% |
| Width | 41.5in | 47.1in | ▲ Ke-200H+5.6 in · +13% |
| Height | 90.6in | 86.3in | ▲ MT1800+4.3 in · +5% |
| Operating Weight | 1,499lb | 1,649lb | ▲ Ke-200H+150 lb · +10% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Mitsubishi MT1800 | Yanmar Ke-200H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Mitsubishi MT1800 | Yanmar Ke-200H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Category I | 3-Point Hitch SAE Category I | — |
| Hitch Category | I | Category 1 | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Mitsubishi MT1800 | Yanmar Ke-200H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Mitsubishi MT1800 | Yanmar Ke-200H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric Starter (12 volts) | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 6th percentile (18 hp)B · 8th percentile (20 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 5th percentile (58.1 ci)B · 7th percentile (61.4 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 6th percentile (1,499 lb)B · 8th percentile (1,649 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 9th percentile (101 in)B · 14th percentile (107 in)
A · MT1800B · Ke-200HMedian Utility Tractor