ShibauraModel A
Shibaura ST321
Utility
- power
- 21 hp
- displacement
- 61.3 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 9
Head to head · Utility
Shibaura ST321 vs Yanmar Ke-200H
Image not recorded
YanmarModel B
Yanmar Ke-200H
Utility
- power
- 20 hp
- displacement
- 61.4 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
ShibauraShibaura ST321
vs
YanmarYanmar Ke-200H
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ ST321 higher · +1 hp (+5%)ST32121 hp
Ke-200H20 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
ST321 is in the 9th percentile; Ke-200H is in the 8th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Ke-200H higher · +0.1 ci (<1%)ST32161.3 ci
Ke-200H61.4 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
ST321 is in the 7th percentile; Ke-200H is in the 7th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedST3213
Ke-200H3
Median Utility Tractor4
ST321 is in the 23rd percentile; Ke-200H is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
= Effectively tiedST3211,649 lb
Ke-200H1,649 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
ST321 is in the 8th percentile; Ke-200H is in the 8th · 5,107 models
ST321 (A)Ke-200H (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Shibaura ST321 | Yanmar Ke-200H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Shibaura | Yanmar | — |
| Model | ST321 | Ke-200H | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Shibaura ST321 | Yanmar Ke-200H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Shibaura | Yanmar | — |
| Model | S773 | 3TNE74 | — |
| Power Output | 21hp | 20hp | ▲ ST321+1 hp · +5% |
| Rated RPM | 2,600RPM | 2,550RPM | ▲ ST321+50 RPM · +2% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 61.3ci | 61.4ci | ▲ Ke-200H+0.1 ci · <1% |
| Bore | 3in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 2.8in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Shibaura ST321 | Yanmar Ke-200H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Hydrostatic | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Shibaura ST321 | Yanmar Ke-200H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 107in | 107in | Same |
| Width | Not recorded | 47.1in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 86.3in | — |
| Operating Weight | 1,649lb | 1,649lb | Same |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Shibaura ST321 | Yanmar Ke-200H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Tires
| Spec | Shibaura ST321 | Yanmar Ke-200H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rear Tire Size | 16 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Shibaura ST321 | Yanmar Ke-200H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Category I | 3-Point Hitch SAE Category I | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | Category 1 | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Shibaura ST321 | Yanmar Ke-200H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Shibaura ST321 | Yanmar Ke-200H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric Starter (12 volts) | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Shibaura ST321 | Yanmar Ke-200H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 0.9gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Shibaura ST321 | Yanmar Ke-200H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 9th percentile (21 hp)B · 8th percentile (20 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 7th percentile (61.3 ci)B · 7th percentile (61.4 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 8th percentile (1,649 lb)B · 8th percentile (1,649 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 14th percentile (107 in)B · 14th percentile (107 in)
A · ST321B · Ke-200HMedian Utility Tractor