Image not recorded
MitsubishiModel A
Mitsubishi MT250
Sub-Compact
- power
- 25 hp
- displacement
- 78.7 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 9
Head to head · Sub-Compact
Mitsubishi MT250 vs Mitsubishi R2000
Image not recorded
MitsubishiModel B
Mitsubishi R2000
Sub-Compact
- power
- 19.7 hp
- displacement
- 60.6 ci
- Cylinders
- 2
- Forward gears
- 6
MitsubishiMitsubishi MT250
vs
MitsubishiMitsubishi R2000
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Sub-Compact
Engine Power
▲ MT250 higher · +5.3 hp (+27%)MT25025 hp
R200019.7 hp
Median Sub-Compact Tractor26.9 hp
MT250 is in the 46th percentile; R2000 is in the 23rd · 816 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT250 higher · +18.1 ci (+30%)MT25078.7 ci
R200060.6 ci
Median Sub-Compact Tractor91.4 ci
MT250 is in the 38th percentile; R2000 is in the 19th · 757 models
Cylinders
▲ MT250 higher · +1 (+50%)MT2503
R20002
Median Sub-Compact Tractor3
MT250 is in the 50th percentile; R2000 is in the 11th · 802 models
Forward Gears
▲ MT250 higher · +3 (+50%)MT2509
R20006
Median Sub-Compact Tractor9
MT250 is in the 50th percentile; R2000 is in the 18th · 616 models
MT250 (A)R2000 (B)Median Sub-Compact Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Mitsubishi MT250 | Mitsubishi R2000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Mitsubishi | Mitsubishi | Same |
| Model | MT250 | R2000 | — |
| Category | Sub-Compact | Sub-Compact | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Mitsubishi MT250 | Mitsubishi R2000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Mitsubishi | Mitsubishi | Same |
| Model | K3H | 2DQ | — |
| Power Output | 25hp | 19.7hp | ▲ MT250+5.3 hp · +27% |
| Rated RPM | 2,700RPM | 2,700RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 3 | 2 | ▲ MT250+1 · +50% |
| Displacement | 78.7ci | 60.6ci | ▲ MT250+18.1 ci · +30% |
| Bore | 3.1in | 3.2in | ▲ R2000+0.1 in · +3% |
| Stroke | 3.5in | 3.7in | ▲ R2000+0.2 in · +6% |
Transmission
| Spec | Mitsubishi MT250 | Mitsubishi R2000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchromesh | Gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Mitsubishi MT250 | Mitsubishi R2000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 103in | 92.1in | ▲ MT250+10.9 in · +12% |
| Width | 46.9in | 54.5in | ▲ R2000+7.6 in · +16% |
| Height | 54.3in | 52in | ▲ MT250+2.3 in · +4% |
| Operating Weight | 1,940lb | 1,786lb | ▲ MT250+154 lb · +9% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Mitsubishi MT250 | Mitsubishi R2000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Tires
| Spec | Mitsubishi MT250 | Mitsubishi R2000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 5.00-15 | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 11.2/10-24 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Mitsubishi MT250 | Mitsubishi R2000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | I | I | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Mitsubishi MT250 | Mitsubishi R2000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Mitsubishi MT250 | Mitsubishi R2000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 26.9 hpA · 46th percentile (25 hp)B · 23rd percentile (19.7 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 91.4 ciA · 38th percentile (78.7 ci)B · 19th percentile (60.6 ci)
Cylinders
median 3A · 50th percentile (3)B · 11th percentile (2)
Forward Gears
median 9A · 50th percentile (9)B · 18th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 2,700 lbA · 35th percentile (1,940 lb)B · 32nd percentile (1,786 lb)
A · MT250B · R2000Median Sub-Compact Tractor