New HollandModel A
New Holland 5030
Utility
- power
- 62 hp
- displacement
- 255 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Utility
New Holland 5030 vs SAME Tiger 65
SAMEModel B
SAME Tiger 65
Utility
- power
- 62 hp
- displacement
- 183 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 12
New HollandNew Holland 5030
vs
SAMESAME Tiger 65
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tied503062 hp
Tiger 6562 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
5030 is in the 56th percentile; Tiger 65 is in the 56th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 5030 higher · +72 ci (+39%)5030255 ci
Tiger 65183 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
5030 is in the 73rd percentile; Tiger 65 is in the 50th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 5030 higher · +1 (+33%)50304
Tiger 653
Median Utility Tractor4
5030 is in the 50th percentile; Tiger 65 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 5030 higher · +4 (+33%)503016
Tiger 6512
Median Utility Tractor12
5030 is in the 73rd percentile; Tiger 65 is in the 50th · 4,941 models
5030 (A)Tiger 65 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | New Holland 5030 | SAME Tiger 65 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | New Holland | SAME | — |
| Model | 5030 | Tiger 65 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | New Holland 5030 | SAME Tiger 65 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | SAME | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 1000.3 | — |
| Power Output | 62hp | 62hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 4 | 3 | ▲ 5030+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 255ci | 183ci | ▲ 5030+72 ci · +39% |
| Bore | 4.4in | 4.1in | ▲ 5030+0.3 in · +7% |
| Stroke | 4.2in | 4.6in | ▲ Tiger 65+0.4 in · +10% |
Transmission
| Spec | New Holland 5030 | SAME Tiger 65 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Partial power shift | Partially synchronized | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | New Holland 5030 | SAME Tiger 65 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 144in | 131in | ▲ 5030+13 in · +10% |
| Width | 69.5in | 77.5in | ▲ Tiger 65+8 in · +12% |
| Height | 99.2in | 60.8in | ▲ 5030+38.4 in · +63% |
| Operating Weight | 5,988lb | 4,762lb | ▲ 5030+1,226 lb · +26% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | New Holland 5030 | SAME Tiger 65 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Open center | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | New Holland 5030 | SAME Tiger 65 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Transmission | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | New Holland 5030 | SAME Tiger 65 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | II/I | II | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 3,075lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | New Holland 5030 | SAME Tiger 65 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
| Brake Type | Differential wet disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | New Holland 5030 | SAME Tiger 65 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | New Holland 5030 | SAME Tiger 65 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 3.3gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | New Holland 5030 | SAME Tiger 65 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Two-post ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 56th percentile (62 hp)B · 56th percentile (62 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 73rd percentile (255 ci)B · 50th percentile (183 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 50th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 56th percentile (5,988 lb)B · 45th percentile (4,762 lb)
A · 5030B · Tiger 65Median Utility Tractor