Image not recorded
RenaultModel A
Renault 75-12 RS
Utility
- power
- 75 hp
- displacement
- 254 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 12
Head to head · Utility
Utility
Utility
How they compare
75-12 RS is in the 68th percentile; Pales 240 is in the 69th · 5,383 models
75-12 RS is in the 72nd percentile; Pales 240 is in the 70th · 5,580 models
75-12 RS is in the 50th percentile; Pales 240 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
75-12 RS is in the 50th percentile; Pales 240 is in the 50th · 4,941 models
Full comparison
| Spec | Renault 75-12 RS | Renault Pales 240 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Renault | Renault | Same |
| Model | 75-12 RS | Pales 240 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
| Spec | Renault 75-12 RS | Renault Pales 240 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | MWM | Deutz | — |
| Model | D226-4 | F4L 913 | — |
| Power Output | 75hp | 76hp | ▲ Pales 240+1 hp · +1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,350RPM | 2,350RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 254ci | 249ci | ▲ 75-12 RS+5 ci · +2% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4in | ▲ 75-12 RS+0.1 in · +2% |
| Stroke | 4.7in | 4.7in | Same |
| Spec | Renault 75-12 RS | Renault Pales 240 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Manual | Not recorded | — |
| Spec | Renault 75-12 RS | Renault Pales 240 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 159in | 148in | ▲ 75-12 RS+11 in · +7% |
| Height | 103in | 93.7in | ▲ 75-12 RS+9.3 in · +10% |
| Operating Weight | 6,880lb | 5,733lb | ▲ 75-12 RS+1,147 lb · +20% |
| Spec | Renault 75-12 RS | Renault Pales 240 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
| Spec | Renault 75-12 RS | Renault Pales 240 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 9.00-16 | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 16.9-34 | Not recorded | — |
| Spec | Renault 75-12 RS | Renault Pales 240 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Category context