Image not recorded
SAMEModel A
SAME Solar 50
Sub-Compact
- power
- 49.6 hp
- displacement
- 166 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 12
Head to head · Sub-Compact
SAME Solar 50 vs SAME Solaris 40
Image not recorded
SAMEModel B
SAME Solaris 40
Sub-Compact
- power
- 41 hp
- displacement
- 91.5 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 12
SAMESAME Solar 50
vs
SAMESAME Solaris 40
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Sub-Compact
Engine Power
▲ Solar 50 higher · +8.6 hp (+21%)Solar 5049.6 hp
Solaris 4041 hp
Median Sub-Compact Tractor26.9 hp
Solar 50 is in the 89th percentile; Solaris 40 is in the 78th · 816 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Solar 50 higher · +74.5 ci (+81%)Solar 50166 ci
Solaris 4091.5 ci
Median Sub-Compact Tractor91.4 ci
Solar 50 is in the 90th percentile; Solaris 40 is in the 52nd · 757 models
Cylinders
▲ Solaris 40 higher · +1 (+33%)Solar 503
Solaris 404
Median Sub-Compact Tractor3
Solar 50 is in the 50th percentile; Solaris 40 is in the 90th · 802 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tiedSolar 5012
Solaris 4012
Median Sub-Compact Tractor9
Solar 50 is in the 73rd percentile; Solaris 40 is in the 73rd · 616 models
Solar 50 (A)Solaris 40 (B)Median Sub-Compact Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | SAME Solar 50 | SAME Solaris 40 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | SAME | SAME | Same |
| Model | Solar 50 | Solaris 40 | — |
| Category | Sub-Compact | Sub-Compact | Same |
Engine
| Spec | SAME Solar 50 | SAME Solaris 40 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | SAME | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | 983 L | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 49.6hp | 41hp | ▲ Solar 50+8.6 hp · +21% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 3,000RPM | ▲ Solaris 40+800 RPM · +36% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 4 | ▲ Solaris 40+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 166ci | 91.5ci | ▲ Solar 50+74.5 ci · +81% |
| Bore | 3.9in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 4.7in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | SAME Solar 50 | SAME Solaris 40 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchronized | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | SAME Solar 50 | SAME Solaris 40 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 124in | 117in | ▲ Solar 50+7 in · +6% |
| Width | 66in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 79.5in | — |
| Operating Weight | 4,409lb | 2,910lb | ▲ Solar 50+1,499 lb · +52% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | SAME Solar 50 | SAME Solaris 40 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Manual | Not recorded | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | SAME Solar 50 | SAME Solaris 40 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | SAME Solar 50 | SAME Solaris 40 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Category I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | Category 3 | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | SAME Solar 50 | SAME Solaris 40 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | SAME Solar 50 | SAME Solaris 40 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | 12V | Not recorded | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | SAME Solar 50 | SAME Solaris 40 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 26.9 hpA · 89th percentile (49.6 hp)B · 78th percentile (41 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 91.4 ciA · 90th percentile (166 ci)B · 52nd percentile (91.5 ci)
Cylinders
median 3A · 50th percentile (3)B · 90th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 9A · 73rd percentile (12)B · 73rd percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 2,700 lbA · 86th percentile (4,409 lb)B · 54th percentile (2,910 lb)
A · Solar 50B · Solaris 40Median Sub-Compact Tractor