Head to head · Four-Wheel Drive

Steiger 800 Tiger vs Woods & Copeland 320C

Image not recorded
SteigerModel A

Steiger 800 Tiger

Four-Wheel Drive

power
300 hp
displacement
Not recorded
Cylinders
8
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full 800 Tiger specs
Image not recorded
Woods & CopelandModel B

Woods & Copeland 320C

Four-Wheel Drive

power
320 hp
displacement
Not recorded
Cylinders
Not recorded
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full 320C specs
SteigerSteiger 800 Tiger
vs
Woods & CopelandWoods & Copeland 320C

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Four-Wheel Drive

n = 162–162

Engine Power

▲ 320C higher · +20 hp (+7%)
800 Tiger300 hp
320C320 hp
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor375 hp

800 Tiger is in the 26th percentile; 320C is in the 32nd · 162 models

800 Tiger (A)320C (B)Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecSteiger 800 TigerWoods & Copeland 320CDifference
ManufacturerSteigerWoods & Copeland—
Model800 Tiger320C—
CategoryFour-Wheel DriveFour-Wheel DriveSame

Engine

SpecSteiger 800 TigerWoods & Copeland 320CDifference
ManufacturerCumminsCumminsSame
Power Output300hp320hp▲ 320C+20 hp · +7%
Cylinders8Not recorded—

Hitch & Towing

SpecSteiger 800 TigerWoods & Copeland 320CDifference
Hitch CategoryIIIIIISame

Chassis & Drive

SpecSteiger 800 TigerWoods & Copeland 320CDifference
Chassis Type4x4 4WD4x4 articulated 4WD—
Drive Type4WD4WDSame

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 375 hp
A · 26th percentile (300 hp)B · 32nd percentile (320 hp)
A · 800 TigerB · 320CMedian Four-Wheel Drive Tractor
Full spec pageSteiger 800 TigerFull spec pageWoods & Copeland 320C