Head to head · Four-Wheel Drive

Steiger CU-325 vs Woods & Copeland 320C

Image not recorded
SteigerModel A

Steiger CU-325

Utility

power
325 hp
displacement
Not recorded
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
10
Full CU-325 specs
Image not recorded
Woods & CopelandModel B

Woods & Copeland 320C

Four-Wheel Drive

power
320 hp
displacement
Not recorded
Cylinders
Not recorded
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full 320C specs
SteigerSteiger CU-325
vs
Woods & CopelandWoods & Copeland 320C

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Four-Wheel Drive

n = 162162

Engine Power

▲ CU-325 higher · +5 hp (+2%)
CU-325325 hp
320C320 hp
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor375 hp

CU-325 is in the 35th percentile; 320C is in the 32nd · 162 models

CU-325 (A)320C (B)Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecSteiger CU-325Woods & Copeland 320CDifference
ManufacturerSteigerWoods & Copeland
ModelCU-325320C
CategoryUtility, Four-Wheel DriveFour-Wheel Drive

Engine

SpecSteiger CU-325Woods & Copeland 320CDifference
ManufacturerCumminsCumminsSame
Power Output325hp320hpCU-325+5 hp · +2%
Cylinders6Not recorded

Transmission

SpecSteiger CU-325Woods & Copeland 320CDifference
TypeClosedNot recorded

Hitch & Towing

SpecSteiger CU-325Woods & Copeland 320CDifference
Hitch Category3III

Chassis & Drive

SpecSteiger CU-325Woods & Copeland 320CDifference
Chassis Type4x44x4 articulated 4WD
Drive Type4WD4WDSame

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 375 hp
A · 35th percentile (325 hp)B · 32nd percentile (320 hp)
A · CU-325B · 320CMedian Four-Wheel Drive Tractor
Full spec pageSteiger CU-325Full spec pageWoods & Copeland 320C