Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
TYM T502 vs TYM T503
TYMTYM T502
vs
TYMTYM T503
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ T503 higher · +0.7 hp (+1%)T50250 hp
T50350.7 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
T502 is in the 45th percentile; T503 is in the 47th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ T502 higher · +44 ci (+33%)T502179 ci
T503135 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
T502 is in the 48th percentile; T503 is in the 33rd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ T503 higher · +1 (+33%)T5023
T5034
Median Utility Tractor4
T502 is in the 23rd percentile; T503 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ T503 higher · +4 (+33%)T50212
T50316
Median Utility Tractor12
T502 is in the 50th percentile; T503 is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
T502 (A)T503 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | TYM T502 | TYM T503 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | TYM | TYM | Same |
| Model | T502 | T503 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | TYM T502 | TYM T503 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | John Deere | Caterpillar | — |
| Model | 3029D | C2.2 | — |
| Power Output | 50hp | 50.7hp | ▲ T503+0.7 hp · +1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,500RPM | 2,800RPM | ▲ T503+300 RPM · +12% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 4 | ▲ T503+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 179ci | 135ci | ▲ T502+44 ci · +33% |
| Bore | 4.2in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 4.3in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | TYM T502 | TYM T503 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Sync shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | TYM T502 | TYM T503 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 159in | 141in | ▲ T502+18 in · +13% |
| Width | 70.9in | 62.6in | ▲ T502+8.3 in · +13% |
| Height | 97.6in | 102in | ▲ T503+4.4 in · +5% |
| Operating Weight | 5,952lb | 4,140lb | ▲ T502+1,812 lb · +44% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | TYM T502 | TYM T503 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Dual gear pump | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | TYM T502 | TYM T503 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Rear Type 1 | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | TYM T502 | TYM T503 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | TYM T502 | TYM T503 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | TYM T502 | TYM T503 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 2.3gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | TYM T502 | TYM T503 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 45th percentile (50 hp)B · 47th percentile (50.7 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 48th percentile (179 ci)B · 33rd percentile (135 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 50th percentile (12)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 56th percentile (5,952 lb)B · 39th percentile (4,140 lb)
A · T502B · T503Median Utility Tractor