Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Volvo 2200 vs XTZ XTZ-5020
Image not recorded
XTZModel B
XTZ XTZ-5020
Utility
- power
- 50 hp
- displacement
- 254 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 20
VolvoVolvo 2200
vs
XTZXTZ XTZ-5020
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 2200 higher · +6 hp (+12%)220056 hp
XTZ-502050 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
2200 is in the 51st percentile; XTZ-5020 is in the 45th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ XTZ-5020 higher · +18 ci (+8%)2200236 ci
XTZ-5020254 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
2200 is in the 64th percentile; XTZ-5020 is in the 73rd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied22004
XTZ-50204
Median Utility Tractor4
2200 is in the 50th percentile; XTZ-5020 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ XTZ-5020 higher · +4 (+25%)220016
XTZ-502020
Median Utility Tractor12
2200 is in the 73rd percentile; XTZ-5020 is in the 86th · 4,941 models
2200 (A)XTZ-5020 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Volvo 2200 | XTZ XTZ-5020 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Volvo | XTZ | — |
| Model | 2200 | XTZ-5020 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Volvo 2200 | XTZ XTZ-5020 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Volvo | VMTZ | — |
| Model | D39T | D-144 | — |
| Power Output | 56hp | 50hp | ▲ 2200+6 hp · +12% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | Not recorded | — |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 236ci | 254ci | ▲ XTZ-5020+18 ci · +8% |
| Bore | 3.9in | 4.1in | ▲ XTZ-5020+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 5in | 4.7in | ▲ 2200+0.3 in · +6% |
Transmission
| Spec | Volvo 2200 | XTZ XTZ-5020 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchromesh and two-speed power shift | Manual | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Volvo 2200 | XTZ XTZ-5020 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 146in | 144in | ▲ 2200+2 in · +1% |
| Width | 73.6in | 83.7in | ▲ XTZ-5020+10.1 in · +14% |
| Height | 100in | 104in | ▲ XTZ-5020+4 in · +4% |
| Operating Weight | 6,493lb | 6,570lb | ▲ XTZ-5020+77 lb · +1% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Volvo 2200 | XTZ XTZ-5020 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Volvo 2200 | XTZ XTZ-5020 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Category 3 | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | II | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Volvo 2200 | XTZ XTZ-5020 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Volvo 2200 | XTZ XTZ-5020 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric Starter | Electric | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 51st percentile (56 hp)B · 45th percentile (50 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 64th percentile (236 ci)B · 73rd percentile (254 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 86th percentile (20)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 61st percentile (6,493 lb)B · 62nd percentile (6,570 lb)
A · 2200B · XTZ-5020Median Utility Tractor