Image not recorded
Advance-RumelyModel A
Advance-Rumely 6A
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 404 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 6
Head to head · Utility
Advance-Rumely 6A vs Challenger MT525B MFWD
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT525B MFWD
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 403 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Advance-RumelyAdvance-Rumely 6A
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT525B MFWD
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Displacement
▲ 6A higher · +1 ci (<1%)6A404 ci
MT525B MFWD403 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
6A is in the 90th percentile; MT525B MFWD is in the 90th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied6A6
MT525B MFWD6
Median Utility Tractor4
6A is in the 93rd percentile; MT525B MFWD is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT525B MFWD higher · +5,176 lb (+81%)6A6,370 lb
MT525B MFWD11,546 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
6A is in the 60th percentile; MT525B MFWD is in the 89th · 5,107 models
Length
▲ MT525B MFWD higher · +19 in (+12%)6A163 in
MT525B MFWD182 in
Median Utility Tractor137 in
6A is in the 81st percentile; MT525B MFWD is in the 91st · 4,659 models
6A (A)MT525B MFWD (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Advance-Rumely 6A | Challenger MT525B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Advance-Rumely | Challenger | — |
| Model | 6A | MT525B MFWD | — |
| Category | Utility, Standard Tread | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Advance-Rumely 6A | Challenger MT525B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Waukesha | C6.6 ACERT | — |
| Model | Not recorded | C6.6 ACERT | — |
| Rated RPM | 1,365RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ MT525B MFWD+835 RPM · +61% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 404ci | 403ci | ▲ 6A+1 ci · <1% |
| Bore | 4.3in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 4.8in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Advance-Rumely 6A | Challenger MT525B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Auto Power | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Advance-Rumely 6A | Challenger MT525B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 163in | 182in | ▲ MT525B MFWD+19 in · +12% |
| Width | 70in | 81.6in | ▲ MT525B MFWD+11.6 in · +17% |
| Height | 74in | 113in | ▲ MT525B MFWD+39 in · +53% |
| Operating Weight | 6,370lb | 11,546lb | ▲ MT525B MFWD+5,176 lb · +81% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Advance-Rumely 6A | Challenger MT525B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Manual | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Advance-Rumely 6A | Challenger MT525B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | 3 Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 10,915lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Advance-Rumely 6A | Challenger MT525B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | MFWD | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Advance-Rumely 6A | Challenger MT525B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 9.5gal | 6.8gal | ▲ 6A+2.7 gal · +40% |
Operator Station
| Spec | Advance-Rumely 6A | Challenger MT525B MFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | ROPS/FOPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 90th percentile (404 ci)B · 90th percentile (403 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 93rd percentile (6)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 60th percentile (6,370 lb)B · 89th percentile (11,546 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 81st percentile (163 in)B · 91st percentile (182 in)
Width
median 66 inA · 61st percentile (70 in)B · 84th percentile (81.6 in)
A · 6AB · MT525B MFWDMedian Utility Tractor