Image not recorded
Advance-RumelyModel A
Advance-Rumely 6A
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 404 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 6
Head to head · Utility
Advance-Rumely 6A vs Challenger MT535
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT535
Row Crop
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 365 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 32
Advance-RumelyAdvance-Rumely 6A
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT535
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Displacement
▲ 6A higher · +39 ci (+11%)6A404 ci
MT535365 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
6A is in the 90th percentile; MT535 is in the 88th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied6A6
MT5356
Median Utility Tractor4
6A is in the 93rd percentile; MT535 is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ MT535 higher · +26 (+433%)6A6
MT53532
Median Utility Tractor12
6A is in the 11th percentile; MT535 is in the 97th · 4,941 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT535 higher · +3,230 lb (+51%)6A6,370 lb
MT5359,600 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
6A is in the 60th percentile; MT535 is in the 84th · 5,107 models
6A (A)MT535 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Advance-Rumely 6A | Challenger MT535 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Advance-Rumely | Challenger | — |
| Model | 6A | MT535 | — |
| Category | Utility, Standard Tread | Row Crop | — |
Engine
| Spec | Advance-Rumely 6A | Challenger MT535 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Waukesha | Caterpillar | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 3056 | — |
| Rated RPM | 1,365RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ MT535+835 RPM · +61% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 404ci | 365ci | ▲ 6A+39 ci · +11% |
| Bore | 4.3in | 3.9in | ▲ 6A+0.4 in · +10% |
| Stroke | 4.8in | 5in | ▲ MT535+0.2 in · +4% |
Transmission
| Spec | Advance-Rumely 6A | Challenger MT535 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Partial Power Shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Advance-Rumely 6A | Challenger MT535 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 163in | 179in | ▲ MT535+16 in · +10% |
| Width | 70in | 88in | ▲ MT535+18 in · +26% |
| Height | 74in | 109in | ▲ MT535+35 in · +47% |
| Operating Weight | 6,370lb | 9,600lb | ▲ MT535+3,230 lb · +51% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Advance-Rumely 6A | Challenger MT535 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Closed Center Pressure Flow Compensated (PFC) | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Advance-Rumely 6A | Challenger MT535 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | II | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Advance-Rumely 6A | Challenger MT535 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Manual | Power | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Hydraulic wet disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Advance-Rumely 6A | Challenger MT535 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Advance-Rumely 6A | Challenger MT535 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 9.5gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Advance-Rumely 6A | Challenger MT535 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Optional Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 90th percentile (404 ci)B · 88th percentile (365 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 93rd percentile (6)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 11th percentile (6)B · 97th percentile (32)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 60th percentile (6,370 lb)B · 84th percentile (9,600 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 81st percentile (163 in)B · 90th percentile (179 in)
A · 6AB · MT535Median Utility Tractor