Image not recorded
Advance-RumelyModel A
Advance-Rumely 6A
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 404 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 6
Head to head · Utility
Advance-Rumely 6A vs Challenger MT595B
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT595B
Agricultural
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 449 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Advance-RumelyAdvance-Rumely 6A
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT595B
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Displacement
▲ MT595B higher · +45 ci (+11%)6A404 ci
MT595B449 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
6A is in the 90th percentile; MT595B is in the 93rd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied6A6
MT595B6
Median Utility Tractor4
6A is in the 93rd percentile; MT595B is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT595B higher · +11,315 lb (+178%)6A6,370 lb
MT595B17,685 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
6A is in the 60th percentile; MT595B is in the 94th · 5,107 models
Length
▲ MT595B higher · +37 in (+23%)6A163 in
MT595B200 in
Median Utility Tractor137 in
6A is in the 81st percentile; MT595B is in the 94th · 4,659 models
6A (A)MT595B (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Advance-Rumely 6A | Challenger MT595B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Advance-Rumely | Challenger | — |
| Model | 6A | MT595B | — |
| Category | Utility, Standard Tread | Agricultural | — |
Engine
| Spec | Advance-Rumely 6A | Challenger MT595B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Waukesha | Sisu Diesel | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 74CTA | — |
| Rated RPM | 1,365RPM | Not recorded | — |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 404ci | 449ci | ▲ MT595B+45 ci · +11% |
| Bore | 4.3in | 4.3in | Same |
| Stroke | 4.8in | 5.3in | ▲ MT595B+0.5 in · +10% |
Transmission
| Spec | Advance-Rumely 6A | Challenger MT595B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Continuously variable transmission | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Advance-Rumely 6A | Challenger MT595B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 163in | 200in | ▲ MT595B+37 in · +23% |
| Width | 70in | 118in | ▲ MT595B+48 in · +69% |
| Height | 74in | 122in | ▲ MT595B+48 in · +65% |
| Operating Weight | 6,370lb | 17,685lb | ▲ MT595B+11,315 lb · +178% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Advance-Rumely 6A | Challenger MT595B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Closed center pressure flow compensated | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Hydrostatic power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Advance-Rumely 6A | Challenger MT595B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | Category III | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Advance-Rumely 6A | Challenger MT595B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Advance-Rumely 6A | Challenger MT595B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Advance-Rumely 6A | Challenger MT595B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 9.5gal | 9gal | ▲ 6A+0.5 gal · +6% |
Operator Station
| Spec | Advance-Rumely 6A | Challenger MT595B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 90th percentile (404 ci)B · 93rd percentile (449 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 93rd percentile (6)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 60th percentile (6,370 lb)B · 94th percentile (17,685 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 81st percentile (163 in)B · 94th percentile (200 in)
Width
median 66 inA · 61st percentile (70 in)B · 98th percentile (118 in)
A · 6AB · MT595BMedian Utility Tractor