Image not recorded
Advance-RumelyModel A
Advance-Rumely 6A
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 404 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 6
Head to head · Standard Tread
Advance-Rumely 6A vs Massey-Harris Challenger
Massey-HarrisModel B
Massey-Harris Challenger
Standard Tread
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 248 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 4
Advance-RumelyAdvance-Rumely 6A
vs
Massey-HarrisMassey-Harris Challenger
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Standard Tread
Engine Displacement
▲ 6A higher · +156 ci (+63%)6A404 ci
Challenger248 ci
Median Standard Tread Tractor382 ci
6A is in the 54th percentile; Challenger is in the 20th · 353 models
Cylinders
▲ 6A higher · +2 (+50%)6A6
Challenger4
Median Standard Tread Tractor4
6A is in the 93rd percentile; Challenger is in the 50th · 367 models
Forward Gears
▲ 6A higher · +2 (+50%)6A6
Challenger4
Median Standard Tread Tractor4
6A is in the 79th percentile; Challenger is in the 50th · 341 models
Operating Weight
▲ 6A higher · +2,170 lb (+52%)6A6,370 lb
Challenger4,200 lb
Median Standard Tread Tractor6,834 lb
6A is in the 42nd percentile; Challenger is in the 16th · 297 models
6A (A)Challenger (B)Median Standard Tread Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Advance-Rumely 6A | Massey-Harris Challenger | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Advance-Rumely | Massey-Harris | — |
| Model | 6A | Challenger | — |
| Category | Utility, Standard Tread | Standard Tread | — |
Engine
| Spec | Advance-Rumely 6A | Massey-Harris Challenger | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Waukesha | Massey-Harris | — |
| Rated RPM | 1,365RPM | 1,200RPM | ▲ 6A+165 RPM · +14% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 4 | ▲ 6A+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 404ci | 248ci | ▲ 6A+156 ci · +63% |
| Bore | 4.3in | 3.9in | ▲ 6A+0.4 in · +10% |
| Stroke | 4.8in | 5.3in | ▲ Challenger+0.5 in · +10% |
Transmission
| Spec | Advance-Rumely 6A | Massey-Harris Challenger | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Gear | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Advance-Rumely 6A | Massey-Harris Challenger | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 163in | 129in | ▲ 6A+34 in · +26% |
| Width | 70in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 74in | 58in | ▲ 6A+16 in · +28% |
| Operating Weight | 6,370lb | 4,200lb | ▲ 6A+2,170 lb · +52% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Advance-Rumely 6A | Massey-Harris Challenger | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Manual | Manual | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Advance-Rumely 6A | Massey-Harris Challenger | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Manual | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Advance-Rumely 6A | Massey-Harris Challenger | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 9.5gal | 5gal | ▲ 6A+4.5 gal · +90% |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 382 ciA · 54th percentile (404 ci)B · 20th percentile (248 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 93rd percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 4A · 79th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 6,834 lbA · 42nd percentile (6,370 lb)B · 16th percentile (4,200 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 82nd percentile (163 in)B · 29th percentile (129 in)
A · 6AB · ChallengerMedian Standard Tread Tractor