Advance-RumelyModel A
Advance-Rumely DoAll
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 173 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 2
Head to head · Utility
Advance-Rumely DoAll vs Cockshutt 80
Image not recorded
CockshuttModel B
Cockshutt 80
Row Crop
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 334 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 3
Advance-RumelyAdvance-Rumely DoAll
vs
CockshuttCockshutt 80
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Displacement
▲ 80 higher · +161 ci (+93%)DoAll173 ci
80334 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
DoAll is in the 46th percentile; 80 is in the 86th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedDoAll4
804
Median Utility Tractor4
DoAll is in the 50th percentile; 80 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 80 higher · +1 (+50%)DoAll2
803
Median Utility Tractor12
DoAll is in the 1st percentile; 80 is in the 3rd · 4,941 models
Operating Weight
▲ 80 higher · +1,098 lb (+30%)DoAll3,702 lb
804,800 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
DoAll is in the 32nd percentile; 80 is in the 46th · 5,107 models
DoAll (A)80 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Cockshutt 80 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Advance-Rumely | Cockshutt | — |
| Model | DoAll | 80 | — |
| Category | Utility | Row Crop | — |
Engine
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Cockshutt 80 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Waukesha | Waukesha-Oliver | — |
| Rated RPM | 1,400RPM | 1,200RPM | ▲ DoAll+200 RPM · +17% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 173ci | 334ci | ▲ 80+161 ci · +93% |
| Bore | 3.5in | 4.5in | ▲ 80+1 in · +29% |
| Stroke | 4.5in | 5.3in | ▲ 80+0.8 in · +18% |
Transmission
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Cockshutt 80 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Gear | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Cockshutt 80 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 110in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 82in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 64in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 3,702lb | 4,800lb | ▲ 80+1,098 lb · +30% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Cockshutt 80 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Manual | Manual | Same |
Tread Width
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Cockshutt 80 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rear Tread | Not recorded | 11.3in | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Cockshutt 80 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Manual | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Cockshutt 80 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Hand-crank | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Advance-Rumely DoAll | Cockshutt 80 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 5.5gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 46th percentile (173 ci)B · 86th percentile (334 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 1st percentile (2)B · 3rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 32nd percentile (3,702 lb)B · 46th percentile (4,800 lb)
A · DoAllB · 80Median Utility Tractor