Head to head · Agricultural

Advance-Rumely OilPull E 30/60 vs Ford 6610 Mark III

Image not recorded
Advance-RumelyModel A

Advance-Rumely OilPull E 30/60

Agricultural

power
Not recorded
displacement
1,885 ci
Cylinders
2
Forward gears
1
Full OilPull E 30/60 specs
Advance-RumelyAdvance-Rumely OilPull E 30/60
vs
FordFord 6610 Mark III

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural

n = 795–1,130

Engine Displacement

▲ OilPull E 30/60 higher · +1,617 ci (+603%)
OilPull E 30/601,885 ci
6610 Mark III268 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci

OilPull E 30/60 is in the 99th percentile; 6610 Mark III is in the 37th · 1,083 models

Cylinders

▲ 6610 Mark III higher · +2 (+100%)
OilPull E 30/602
6610 Mark III4
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5

OilPull E 30/60 is in the 3rd percentile; 6610 Mark III is in the 31st · 1,130 models

Forward Gears

▲ 6610 Mark III higher · +15 (+1500%)
OilPull E 30/601
6610 Mark III16
Median Agricultural Tractor16

OilPull E 30/60 is in the 1st percentile; 6610 Mark III is in the 50th · 972 models

Operating Weight

▲ OilPull E 30/60 higher · +19,020 lb (+261%)
OilPull E 30/6026,300 lb
6610 Mark III7,280 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb

OilPull E 30/60 is in the 93rd percentile; 6610 Mark III is in the 26th · 971 models

OilPull E 30/60 (A)6610 Mark III (B)Median Agricultural Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecAdvance-Rumely OilPull E 30/60Ford 6610 Mark IIIDifference
ManufacturerAdvance-RumelyFord—
ModelOilPull E 30/606610 Mark III—
CategoryAgriculturalUtility—

Engine

SpecAdvance-Rumely OilPull E 30/60Ford 6610 Mark IIIDifference
ManufacturerRumleyFord—
Rated RPMNot recorded2,070RPM—
Cylinders24▲ 6610 Mark III+2 · +100%
Displacement1,885ci268ci▲ OilPull E 30/60+1,617 ci · +603%
Bore10in4.4in▲ OilPull E 30/60+5.6 in · +127%
Stroke12in4.4in▲ OilPull E 30/60+7.6 in · +173%

Transmission

SpecAdvance-Rumely OilPull E 30/60Ford 6610 Mark IIIDifference
TypeGearDual Power—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecAdvance-Rumely OilPull E 30/60Ford 6610 Mark IIIDifference
Length228in145in▲ OilPull E 30/60+83 in · +57%
Width116inNot recorded—
Height132in110in▲ OilPull E 30/60+22 in · +20%
Operating Weight26,300lb7,280lb▲ OilPull E 30/60+19,020 lb · +261%

Hydraulics

SpecAdvance-Rumely OilPull E 30/60Ford 6610 Mark IIIDifference
System TypeNot recordedOpen center with closed-center valves—
Steering TypeManualPower—

Hitch & Towing

SpecAdvance-Rumely OilPull E 30/60Ford 6610 Mark IIIDifference
Hitch TypeNot recordedThree-Point Hitch—
Hitch CategoryNot recordedCategory 3—
Hitch PositionNot recordedRear—

Chassis & Drive

SpecAdvance-Rumely OilPull E 30/60Ford 6610 Mark IIIDifference
Chassis Type4x24x2 2WD—
Drive Type2WD2WDSame
Steering TypeManualPower—

Capacities

SpecAdvance-Rumely OilPull E 30/60Ford 6610 Mark IIIDifference
Coolant70galNot recorded—

Operator Station

SpecAdvance-Rumely OilPull E 30/60Ford 6610 Mark IIIDifference
TypeNot recordedROPS—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Displacement

median 336 ci
A · 99th percentile (1,885 ci)B · 37th percentile (268 ci)

Cylinders

median 5.5
A · 3rd percentile (2)B · 31st percentile (4)

Forward Gears

median 16
A · 1st percentile (1)B · 50th percentile (16)

Operating Weight

median 10,914 lb
A · 93rd percentile (26,300 lb)B · 26th percentile (7,280 lb)

Length

median 173 in
A · 92nd percentile (228 in)B · 22nd percentile (145 in)
A · OilPull E 30/60B · 6610 Mark IIIMedian Agricultural Tractor
Full spec pageAdvance-Rumely OilPull E 30/60Full spec pageFord 6610 Mark III