Image not recorded
Head to head · Row Crop
AGCO DT180 vs CaseIH Puma 220
CaseIHModel B
CaseIH Puma 220
Row Crop
- power
- 220 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
AGCOAGCO DT180
vs
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 220
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ Puma 220 higher · +5 hp (+2%)DT180215 hp
Puma 220220 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
DT180 is in the 80th percentile; Puma 220 is in the 82nd · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ DT180 higher · +94 ci (+23%)DT180505 ci
Puma 220411 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
DT180 is in the 89th percentile; Puma 220 is in the 60th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedDT1806
Puma 2206
Median Row Crop Tractor6
DT180 is in the 50th percentile; Puma 220 is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tiedDT18018
Puma 22018
Median Row Crop Tractor16
DT180 is in the 61st percentile; Puma 220 is in the 61st · 1,200 models
DT180 (A)Puma 220 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO DT180 | CaseIH Puma 220 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | CaseIH | — |
| Model | DT180 | Puma 220 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO DT180 | CaseIH Puma 220 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cummins | FPT | — |
| Model | C8.3L | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 215hp | 220hp | ▲ Puma 220+5 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 505ci | 411ci | ▲ DT180+94 ci · +23% |
| Bore | 4.5in | 4.1in | ▲ DT180+0.4 in · +10% |
| Stroke | 5.3in | 5.2in | ▲ DT180+0.1 in · +2% |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO DT180 | CaseIH Puma 220 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | 18-speed full power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO DT180 | CaseIH Puma 220 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 203in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 98.2in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 121in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 18,500lb | 15,900lb | ▲ DT180+2,600 lb · +16% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO DT180 | CaseIH Puma 220 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center pressure flow compensated (PFC) | Closed center pressure flow compensating | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | AGCO DT180 | CaseIH Puma 220 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Independent | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 1,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO DT180 | CaseIH Puma 220 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-point hitch | II/IIIN | — |
| Hitch Category | Category 3/IIIN | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | 18,000lb | 28,660lb | ▲ Puma 220+10,660 lb · +59% |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO DT180 | CaseIH Puma 220 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Power | — |
| Brake Type | Hydraulic wet disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO DT180 | CaseIH Puma 220 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Emissions
| Spec | AGCO DT180 | CaseIH Puma 220 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control System | Not recorded | Selective Catalytic Reduction | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO DT180 | CaseIH Puma 220 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab standard | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 80th percentile (215 hp)B · 82nd percentile (220 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 89th percentile (505 ci)B · 60th percentile (411 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 61st percentile (18)B · 61st percentile (18)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 80th percentile (18,500 lb)B · 70th percentile (15,900 lb)
A · DT180B · Puma 220Median Row Crop Tractor