Head to head · Row Crop

AGCO DT250B vs Challenger MT675C

Image not recorded
AGCOModel A

AGCO DT250B

Row Crop

power
290 hp
displacement
513 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full DT250B specs
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B

Challenger MT675C

Agricultural

power
281 hp
displacement
513 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full MT675C specs
AGCOAGCO DT250B
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT675C

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop

n = 1,140–1,417

Engine Power

▲ DT250B higher · +9 hp (+3%)
DT250B290 hp
MT675C281 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp

DT250B is in the 92nd percentile; MT675C is in the 91st · 1,206 models

Engine Displacement

= Effectively tied
DT250B513 ci
MT675C513 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci

DT250B is in the 92nd percentile; MT675C is in the 92nd · 1,409 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
DT250B6
MT675C6
Median Row Crop Tractor6

DT250B is in the 50th percentile; MT675C is in the 50th · 1,417 models

Operating Weight

▲ DT250B higher · +165 lb (<1%)
DT250B25,960 lb
MT675C25,795 lb
Median Row Crop Tractor12,307 lb

DT250B is in the 95th percentile; MT675C is in the 95th · 1,350 models

DT250B (A)MT675C (B)Median Row Crop Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecAGCO DT250BChallenger MT675CDifference
ManufacturerAGCOChallenger—
ModelDT250BMT675C—
CategoryRow CropAgricultural—

Engine

SpecAGCO DT250BChallenger MT675CDifference
ManufacturerAGCO SISU POWERAGCO SISU POWERSame
Model84CTA84CTASame
Power Output290hp281hp▲ DT250B+9 hp · +3%
Rated RPM2,200RPM2,200RPMSame
Cylinders66Same
Displacement513ci513ciSame
Bore4.4in4.4inSame
Stroke5.7in5.7inSame

Transmission

SpecAGCO DT250BChallenger MT675CDifference
TypeContinuously variable transmissionTechstar CVT, continuously variable transmission—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecAGCO DT250BChallenger MT675CDifference
Length216in223in▲ MT675C+7 in · +3%
Height141in133in▲ DT250B+8 in · +6%
Operating Weight25,960lb25,795lb▲ DT250B+165 lb · <1%

Hydraulics

SpecAGCO DT250BChallenger MT675CDifference
System TypeClosed center pressure flow compensated (PFC)Closed center load sensing—
Pump Flow Capacity51gpmNot recorded—
Steering TypePowerNot recorded—

Power Take-off (PTO)

SpecAGCO DT250BChallenger MT675CDifference
TypeOptional Front and Independent Rear with electro-hydraulic clutchNot recorded—
Speed 11,000rpmNot recorded—
Speed 21,000rpmNot recorded—

Tires

SpecAGCO DT250BChallenger MT675CDifference
Front Tire SizeNot recorded420/90R30—
Rear Tire SizeNot recorded480/80R46—

Hitch & Towing

SpecAGCO DT250BChallenger MT675CDifference
Hitch TypeThree-Point HitchNot recorded—
Hitch CategoryIIIIIISame
Hitch PositionRearRearSame
Hitch Capacity26,460lbNot recorded—

Chassis & Drive

SpecAGCO DT250BChallenger MT675CDifference
Chassis TypeType front wheel assist with dualsNot recorded—
Drive Type4WDNot recorded—
Steering TypePowerNot recorded—
Brake TypeHydraulic wet discNot recorded—

Electrical

SpecAGCO DT250BChallenger MT675CDifference
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Operator Station

SpecAGCO DT250BChallenger MT675CDifference
TypeCab with heat and air-conditioningNot recorded—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 138 hp
A · 92nd percentile (290 hp)B · 91st percentile (281 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 391 ci
A · 92nd percentile (513 ci)B · 92nd percentile (513 ci)

Cylinders

median 6
A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)

Operating Weight

median 12,307 lb
A · 95th percentile (25,960 lb)B · 95th percentile (25,795 lb)

Length

median 180 in
A · 88th percentile (216 in)B · 92nd percentile (223 in)
A · DT250BB · MT675CMedian Row Crop Tractor
Full spec pageAGCO DT250BFull spec pageChallenger MT675C