Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
AGCO GT65 vs CaseIH JXU 75

CaseIHModel B
CaseIH JXU 75
Utility
- power
- 75.1 hp
- displacement
- 274 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 12
AGCOAGCO GT65
vs
CaseIHCaseIH JXU 75
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ JXU 75 higher · +4.1 hp (+6%)GT6571 hp
JXU 7575.1 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
GT65 is in the 64th percentile; JXU 75 is in the 68th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ JXU 75 higher · +30 ci (+12%)GT65244 ci
JXU 75274 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
GT65 is in the 68th percentile; JXU 75 is in the 79th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedGT654
JXU 754
Median Utility Tractor4
GT65 is in the 50th percentile; JXU 75 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ GT65 higher · +4 (+33%)GT6516
JXU 7512
Median Utility Tractor12
GT65 is in the 73rd percentile; JXU 75 is in the 50th · 4,941 models
GT65 (A)JXU 75 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | CaseIH JXU 75 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | CaseIH | — |
| Model | GT65 | JXU 75 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | CaseIH JXU 75 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | SAME Deutz-Fahr | Iveco | — |
| Model | Not recorded | NEF F4C | — |
| Power Output | 71hp | 75.1hp | ▲ JXU 75+4.1 hp · +6% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,300RPM | ▲ JXU 75+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 244ci | 274ci | ▲ JXU 75+30 ci · +12% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.1in | Same |
| Stroke | 4.5in | 5.2in | ▲ JXU 75+0.7 in · +16% |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | CaseIH JXU 75 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchro-shuttle | Mechanical shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | CaseIH JXU 75 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 152in | 162in | ▲ JXU 75+10 in · +7% |
| Width | 76.7in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 106in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 5,335lb | 8,929lb | ▲ JXU 75+3,594 lb · +67% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | CaseIH JXU 75 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Tires
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | CaseIH JXU 75 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 16-Sep | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 18.4-30 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | CaseIH JXU 75 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | II | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | CaseIH JXU 75 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | CaseIH JXU 75 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | CaseIH JXU 75 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Available with ROPS or cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 64th percentile (71 hp)B · 68th percentile (75.1 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 68th percentile (244 ci)B · 79th percentile (274 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 50th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 50th percentile (5,335 lb)B · 81st percentile (8,929 lb)
A · GT65B · JXU 75Median Utility Tractor